Sunday, August 9, 2015

Read of the Day

On February 3rd of this year, ISIS released a video of their members executing Jordanian pilot Mu’ath al-Kaseasbeh by burning him alive in a cage.  The world expressed outrage and disgust and then returned to being "concerned" and writing sternly worded letters.  In response, ISIS burned three Iraqis to death.

Sultan Knish points out the Muslims have been burning Jews alive as a matter of policy, and if the west does anything at all it's put pressure on Israel to release the terrorists that do it.  A sample of the stories he tells: 
The Moses family was driving on a pre-holiday shopping trip before Passover when their car was struck by a Muslim firebomb. Ofra Moses, who was five-months pregnant, wasn’t able to get her seatbelt open and burned to death. It took her 5-year-old son Tal another three months to die of his burns.

His 8-year-old sister Adi suffered severe burns as her father rolled her burning body in the sand to put out the flames. “I looked in the direction of our car and watched as my mother burned in front of my eyes,” she recalls.

She still remembers lying bandaged while her little brother screamed in pain in the next room.

Mohammad Daoud, the Muslim terrorist who did this to the family, was given two life sentences and an additional 72 years. But when the PLO demanded his release, Obama and Kerry forced Israel to comply.
This is accepted practice in Islam.  There are fire bombing attacks all the time in Israel. 

The problem is Islam. Go read


6 comments:

  1. I don't doubt that there are "good" muslims. People who would never do these things and live normal lives. The problem with this is that in their heart they don't really condem the violent terrorists muslims. In some ways (bear with me as a stretch to make a point) it is no different with American hispanics who like Geraldo Rivera will say they are (somewhat) opposed toillegal immigration BUT their every action and every spoken word is to push for amnesty and more immigration and even open borders. They are good people who willbenefit by being of the same tribe as the eventual victors in this big culture war (the American hispanics AND the "good" muslims). They can't help themselves, it is perhaps even a normalhuman trait. it isn't any different from the Southerner of 100 years ago who was not a KKK and didn't like some of the things they did but was silently kinda supportive of it.

    Where the issue of militant Islam is so different from the KKK racism or massive illegal immigration is that there are well over a billion muslims and even the "good" ones support the efforts to make the world subject to Islam. Sooner or later this must end in a world war and since we decided a few years ago to import hundreds of thousands of muslims some of the hand to hand fighting must take place in our country; our cities. The longer we wait (I'm really not saying we should start a war any more than the weather man is trying to destroy New Orleans when they predict a cat V hurricane) the worse it will be. If we don't take it seriously now we will inevitably see another and far worse 9/11. We failed last time, our response was inaccurate at best and obviously wasted. We may get a second chance or we may get something much worse.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, I'm almost willing to bet money that the next time "they" come, it will be with a nuke (or two)......

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Good" muslims is an oxymoron. Any _true_ muslim, who follows the commands of the qur'an and hadith (I don't capitalize anything to do with islam - I won't give it that respect). The qur'an itself says that any of the faithful who do not follow the qur'an are apostates and are to be put to death. Even the "good" muslims (i.e., the ones not currently killing infidels, stoning or setting their daughters on fire for wearing Western clothes or dating an infidel (or dating period), molesting/raping a nine-year-old child, removing the clitoris from a female infant with a razor blade, keeping sex slaves, or having intercourse with animals) will tell you straight out that anyone who does not do as the qur'an commands is not a muslim, cannot call himself a muslim.

    ISIS is the perfect demonstration of following the words of "the prophet" (p*ss be onto him) as muhammed wanted them followed. No lying and no deception (taqqiya), no pretending to be accepting of infidel neighbors or co-workers (until it is time to shout "allahu akbar" and start shooting innocent people).

    islam (which translates literally as "submission") was created to give muhammed an army to subdue his enemies. Making it legal to take "war brides" (sex slaves), to beat and abuse their wives, to "marry" nine year old little girls (actually, they can marry them even younger, but aren't supposed to have full-on, penetrating sex with them until they are nine - which in reality is nothing less than raping a child), and all the other "dispensations" he allowed his men, so that he could attract a lot of them to his banner made islam a very popular "religion" (as much a real religion as is Scientology, but a lot nastier). Why do you think so many scumbag Europeans and even Americans are hauling ass to join ISIS? Ugly, digusting individuals who could probably never get laid unless they grab a teenage (or younger) sex-slave from the infidels they capture in the villages they attack.

    I will admit that there are some few who truly do wish to get along with others, but they are not really muslims, as they are ignoring the qur'an. I haven't been able to come up with any idea why someone would want to identify as a muslim if they don't actually _secretly_ hate and wish to kill or enslave infidels. There simply is nothing in the qur'an or hadith that is decent or socially redeeming. The few directives that call for good behavior are admonishments to be good to _other muslims_ - not to infidels.

    So, please try to be accurate. mo-ham-ed made it impossible to be a muslim and also be "good".

    In my book, if you are a true, orthodox muslim - like those of ISIS - , the old adage holds true: the only good muslim is a dead muslim.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The problem is NOT Islam. The problem is the West's "Law Enforcement" who enable Our Betters to force us to grovel before Islam. Enough dead pigs will fix the problem. But not until then. Not until then.

    And it is not the "Democrats". "Religion of Peace" is a Shrub II construct. The two parties are nothing more than opposite ends of the same steaming turd.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not to invoke the name of any specific religion, any religion that venerates a mass murdering pedophile brigand as the most perfect man ever is jacked up and unsalvagable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. While it is absolutely correct,"The" problem isn't islam, islam is "A" very serious problem, as they are learning in Europe and elsewhere (Dearborn, MI for example?). 100% of the rapes in Oslo, the thousands of young girls, raped, gang-raped, and used for prostitution in Rotherham and elsewhere, etc., etc. The killings and burnings in Israel and other countries. The shootings here in ours.

    I'll leave everyone with these tid-bits:

    "One of Islam’s highest leaders, the now deceased Ayatollah Khomeni, who lead the Islamic
    revolution in 1979 in Iran and who, until his death in 1989, was the highest authority of the
    country, both politically and religiously, also wrote the book Tahrirolvasyleh
    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tahrir-ol-vasyleh#cite_note-0), which is a collection of Islamic rules
    of conduct for Muslims. Here he is quoted for (http://g33klite.com/index.php/facts/general/299-
    the-controversial-tahrirolvasyleh-book):"

    “A man can quench his sexual thirst by use of a baby.
    The only condition is that he does not penetrate the vagina, but anal sex is okay.” [Technically, a man _can_ penetrate the vagina, but he then has to provide for the infant for the rest of its life. However, it doesn't say he can't also starve, beat, continue to molest, allow others to molest, other wives to beat and abuse the child.]

    Elsewhere, he writes that: “It is better if a girl marries so early that she gets her first period in the
    home of her husband rather than in the home of the father. Every father who gives his daughter
    away in marriage at such an early age will have obtained a place in heaven.” [The imams _really like this one, although a lot of them are partial to little boys. Google "bacha bereesh" and "bacha bazi"sometime.]

    And further: “A man can have anal sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels, etc. However,
    he should kill the animal after ejaculating.” (islamic "scholars" say the meat cannot be sold in your village, however it _can_ be sold in any other village.)

    So, folks: point out those "Good muslims", would you please? OK, I see them - right over there next to the unicorns.

    ReplyDelete