Now that SpaceX has bought the AI company xAI, it seems that SpaceX is leading them into the often-talked about solution to the enormous power problems with AI - data centers in space.
Last week, SpaceX founder Elon Musk advised workers at the newly acquired company xAI that he wants to set up a factory on the moon to build artificial intelligence (AI) satellites. And he called for a colossal catapult on the lunar surface to fling them into space.
"My estimate is that, within two to three years, the lowest-cost way to generate AI compute will be in space," Elon Musk wrote in a Feb. 2 update that announced SpaceX's acquisition of xAI.
While launching satellites with existing technologies like the Falcon family or the Starship, Musk envisions something launched by the planned human outposts on the moon. Factories on the moon could take advantage of lunar resources to produce the satellites, as well as to build mass drivers on the moon to hurl the satellites into their orbits.
"By using an electromagnetic mass driver and lunar manufacturing," he wrote, "it is possible to put 500 to 1000 TW/year [terawatts per year] of AI satellites into deep space, meaningfully ascend the Kardashev scale and harness a non-trivial percentage of the sun’s power."
...
Musk isn't the first person to propose the use of mass drivers — which are basically railguns — on the moon. He's following in the footsteps of space visionary Gerard O'Neill, who floated the idea back in 1974.
Railguns may not be as familiar as coil guns, which are numbers of coils aligned along a straight path with the power to each coil pulsed in time to add energy into a payload traveling along the controlled path as the payload reaches each coil. O'Neill worked on the design of mass drivers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), along with colleague Henry Kolm and a group of student volunteers to construct their first mass driver prototype. They eventually concluded that a mass driver only 520 feet long could boost material off the lunar surface.
Artist's illustration of an electromagnetic mass driver launching a payload
from the surface of the moon. (Image credit: General Atomics Electromagnetic
Systems)
You may have heard of the existing electromagnetic aircraft launch system, now operating reliably on the U.S. Navy's Gerald R. Ford nuclear aircraft carrier. It's the same basic technology as a mass driver.
How far out in the future is a scenario like this? It's going to require a largely self-sufficient colony on the moon that operates at all times - not shutting down for the (two week) night. I'd guess such a colony would be underground for a number of reasons. Starship is the only vehicle being talked about that has capacity to deliver the kinds of numbers of tons of payloads that it would require to build and support such a colony, with the ability to deliver 100 metric tons at a time to the lunar surface. While I like the way Musk refers to "... within two to three years, the lowest-cost way to generate AI compute will be in space," I'd love to see that, but it doesn't look like anything is moving that fast. I think predicting 2035 is going out on a limb.
I stand by my opinion that AI is the biggest hype episode in world history. Everyone acts like there will be one winner and they'll be the one.

Robert Heinlein's book "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" had a moon based catapult.
ReplyDeleteAnd it was written in 1966. Fired big metal cans full of grain and other food towards Earth. The cans had some heat shielding, retro-rockets and parachutes.
DeleteThe Loonies used un-parachuted cans full of regolith and rocks to 'bomb' Earth.
Again, 1966. I hate it when Heinlein doesn't get credit for his visionary writings.
I just re-read that book in January. I agree about Heinlein not getting enough credit.
DeleteLet me see if I understand. They're going to collect sunlight on the front side of the PV panels, then radiate the same amount of power as waste heat out on the back side of the same area of panels, using a radiator at an enormously lower temperature than the sun? First, maybe they should invent computer chips that can run white hot, and be their own radiators. Then, the guy who swaps nvidia hardware for warranty repair is going to commute to work in a rocket?
ReplyDeleteEven with a mass driver launching it, the projectile is still going to need onboard propulsion to change its orbit from one that intersects the moon, to one that doesn't. So this wouldn't obviate the need for a propellant plant etc.
ReplyDeleteI can't tell if both anonymous comments are from the same person, but both are great. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteAI if power requirements can be resolved will be a dangerous tool.
ReplyDeleteI've not seen any rules for robotics being deployed and those with the money to do it don't seem to be good neighbor types (looking at Epstein).
Secret Police once were limited to human snitches and paper records. Not so much now once digital cash becomes law.
The scariest part of the AI mess is that they have yet to program an ethical system. There are so many stories about AI lying, cheating, just making shit up, and more that it shouldn't be within a mile of real life.
DeleteAsimov's three laws don't go far enough. Program the ten commandments.
Continuous operations will require nuclear power, the economics of the batteries required to operate for that long in the dark plus tripling the size of the solar arrays so they can be recharged efficiently makes pure solar power for any base a non-starter once humans are permanent residents.
ReplyDeleteMy bet is Elon will form yet another company to develop modular nuclear power systems. He already has the tunnel boring equipment and electric vehicles taken care of.
SpaceX has the solar energy collection and storage expertise from Starlink & Tesla Powerwall to lean on. For an initial moon base that might be acceptable.
ReplyDeleteAn early "show the flag" mission might consist of perhaps 3 crew, the lunar night powerbrequirements wouldn't be too excessive.
I wonder how many Starship flights it would take to put one of Musk's tunnel machines on the moon?
DeleteIf you're going with a Version 4 Starship and a 6 meter diameter tunnel boring and sealing machine, probably 1. Maybe 2. 8 meter diameter 2, maybe 3. That's how big V4 is, at a carrying capacity of 200 tons or so. Now, will HLS be a V3 or a V4?
DeleteAs I recall, this was a mechanism used in some of Jerry Pournelle's Scifi works as well.
ReplyDelete