Starship flight test five was less than a month ago, October 13, and that was four months and a week after flight test four on June 6th. When I saw a report today that the next test looks to be under two weeks from today, it shocked me, but the important difference is the delay from flight test four to five was because of the FAA.
The improbable but successful recovery of the Starship first stage with "chopsticks" last month, and the on-target splashdown of the Starship upper stage halfway around the world, allowed SpaceX to avoid an anomaly investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration. Thus, the company was able to press ahead on a sixth test flight if it flew a similar profile.
And that's what SpaceX plans to do, albeit with some notable additions to the flight plan.
As you would expect (this is SpaceX, after all) they intend to fly the same basic mission but with all the lessons learned from Integrated Flight Test 5 (IFT-5) added in to the hardware and software already.
In a statement on its website, SpaceX said the first stage—known as Super Heavy—would fly a similar trajectory to the fifth test flight, which took place on October 13. However, the booster hardware and software will be modified with learnings from the test flight last month.
"Hardware upgrades for this flight add additional redundancy to booster propulsion systems, increase structural strength at key areas, and shorten the timeline to offload propellants from the booster following a successful catch," the company said. "Mission designers also updated software controls and commit criteria for the booster’s launch and return."
My gut feeling is that if this amount of change were being done to SLS, it
would take more like a year than a month or five weeks.
In addition to those fixes to the Superheavy booster, they're adding something
I've honestly been expecting for quite a while: they're going to relight one
of the Starship's engines in space. The trajectory is going to be
suborbital so that the ship will splashdown into the Indian Ocean again even
if the Raptor engine fails to relight but the ability to get those engines to
relight reliably in space is essential to all of the real missions. Reigniting
a Raptor is therefore the next milestone on the
development path for Starship.
Besides that...
Successfully demonstrating the capacity to re-relight Raptors in space enables SpaceX to begin flying commercial missions with Starship and likely opens the way for Starlink launches, possibly as early as the first half of next year. These larger Starlink satellites can only fit within Starship’s capacious payload and will provide direct-to-cell Internet capability.
First half of next year? As in we might see a Starlink launch on a Starship eight or nine weeks from now? Again, as you would expect, there's more to be tested.
"Several thermal protection experiments and operational changes will test the limits of Starship’s capabilities and generate flight data to inform plans for ship catch and reuse," the company's statement said. "The flight test will assess new secondary thermal protection materials and will have entire sections of heat shield tiles removed on either side of the ship in locations being studied for catch-enabling hardware on future vehicles. The ship also will intentionally fly at a higher angle of attack in the final phase of descent, purposefully stressing the limits of flap control to gain data on future landing profiles."
In addition, this will be the last flight of a first generation Starship - the only ones to have ever flown. The next generation Ships include redesigned forward flaps, larger propellant tanks, newer tiles and secondary thermal protection layers.
Screen grab from the Space.com video showing IFT-5's Starship moments before landing vertically in the Indian Ocean NW of Australia. This is video from a camera SpaceX mounted on a buoy where they intended for the Starship to land. And did.
A major difference between the previous tests and the coming IFT-6 is that
while the previous flights lifted off from Boca Chica, Texas in the morning,
around 0830 local time, they are looking for a launch time later in the day,
so that when Starship splashes down half a world away it will be in daylight.
Having reached a near monthly cadence for Starship launches is impressive in itself, but it's essential for the visions Elon Musk has for the Starship/Superheavy vehicle. It's essential if SpaceX wants to unlock the full potential of a rocket that needs multiple refueling launches to support Starship missions to the Moon or Mars.
EDITED Nov. 7, 2024 at 1707 ET to add:
SpaceX announces the launch is to be No Earlier Than Monday, Nov. 18 at
4:00 PM CT
Well, it's pretty damn certain that no one with the FAA will do anything other than say, "How can we help you Mr. Musk, sir?" after Tuesday.
ReplyDeleteWE'RE GOING TO MARS! GAME ON!
Musk is going to have another job isn't he?
DeleteLooking into to why the FAA paperwork takes longer than the spaceship engineering and work do.... and other govt waste.
You know, between news like this and the election results this morning, it's been a pretty good day all around.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to see a breakdown of all the changes from one Starship to another. Especially if the changes are listed with the reason why.
ReplyDeleteOther than that, Go, SpaceX, Go!!!
Not gonna happen, unfortunately - ITAR, EAR and IP and all that jazz, but you can best believe the Chicoms have already tried to steal as much information as they can from SpaceX and Starlink. And they still continue to do so.
DeleteOh, I'm not looking at a specific list of fixes, just a general overview of the changes. Like, "Changed the position and angle of dry thrusters." "Changed the vents to act like thrusters." That type of thing.
DeleteI mean, they started with Hoppy and now they're building S34. A lot of the changes have been documented on videos and on websites, I just want all that information to be consolidated into an easily read/viewed and upgradable format.
Be really kicking if SpaceX or whomever started when the first BFR was proposed.
Don't need trade secrets and ITAR/EAR/IR/ATJ, but there have been such a dizzyingly huge number of changes made that it's hard to keep track.
I wonder if even they have one document in one place that covers all of it from concepts to Hoppy and forward.
DeleteAt least it's not like tracking something that was designed and produced BC - Before CAD in this case. When I first started at my last job, they had what looked like the card catalog in a library, and the drafting department would have something like a card for any given box that was an attempt to keep a list of every drawing number for every subassembly, along with the different revisions of every piece in it. Absolutely essential when they gave me a radio to work on that was built in 1969.
To borrow a quote from Jack Northrup, "Now I Know Why God Let Me Live So Long...."
ReplyDelete