Have they flown anything? Are they working toward flying something?
Almost two weeks ago, December 30, reports started to surface about a "glowing ring of metal" that fell from the sky near a remote village in Kenya.
According to the Kenya Space Agency, the object weighed 1,100 pounds (500 kg) and had a diameter of more than 8 feet (2.4 meters) when measured after it landed on December 30. A couple of days later, the space agency confidently reported that the object was a piece of space debris, saying it was a ring that separated from a rocket. "Such objects are usually designed to burn up as they re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere or to fall over unoccupied areas, such as the oceans," the space agency told The New York Times.
At around eight feet in diameter and half a ton, it clearly wasn't your typical "bits and pieces" that survive reentry but in addition to its pure size, it's also pretty distinctive looking.
A view of the metal ring that fell from the sky on Dec. 30 into Mukuku village in eastern Makueni County, Kenya. Credit: Stringer/Anadolu via Getty Images
Since those initial reports, a group of amateur but experienced space trackers have been trying to determine what space object it might have fallen from. There's still no answer to that, and a couple of interesting twists to the story.
Let's start here:
"It was suggested that the ring is space debris, but the evidence is marginal," wrote Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist working at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. McDowell is highly regarded for his analysis of space objects. "The most likely space-related possibility is the reentry of the SYLDA adapter from the Ariane V184 flight, object 33155. Nevertheless, I am not fully convinced that the ring is space debris at all," he wrote.
Another prominent space tracker, Marco Langbroek, believes it's plausible that the ring came from space, so he investigated further into objects that may have returned around the time of the object's discovery in Kenya. In a blog post written Wednesday he noted that apart from the metal ring, other fragments looking consistent with space debris—including material that looks like carbon wrap and isolation foil—were found several kilometers away from the ring.
First of all both McDowell and Langbroek have graced these pages before (two examples there). Second they both agree that the most likely source for the object was an Ariane V that was launched back in July 2008, in which the European rocket lofted two satellites into geosynchronous transfer orbit. The Ariane V had some unique features, one of which was to stack two satellites going into geosynchronous orbit
To accommodate both satellites, a SYstème de Lancement Double Ariane (SYLDA) shell was placed over the lower satellite to support the mounting of a second satellite on top of it.
Both McDowell and Langbroek speculate the recovered ring is part of the SYLDA from this mission 16 years ago. But here's where it gets more interesting.
However, an anonymous X account using the handle DutchSpace, which despite the anonymity has provided reliable information about Ariane launch vehicles in the past, posted a thread that indicates this ring could not have been part of the SYLDA shell. With images and documentation, it seems clear that neither the diameter nor mass of the SYLDA component matches the ring found in Kenya.
Additionally, Arianespace officials told Le Parisien newspaper on Thursday that they do not believe the space debris was associated with the Ariane V rocket. Essentially, if the ring does not fit, you must acquit.
(Never thought you'd get an OJ Simpson reference in a space story, did ya?)
At this point, the narrative goes cold. As Eric Berger at Ars Technica
ends his piece, "so what was it?" While we can't rule out that "it wuz
Aliens," we have to recognize that probability isn't known but we believe it to
be very low. Therefore, we have to ask what else is up there that can't
be tracked to a known, documented launch that could both be used "open source" and could have dropped a half ton
part without warning. One simple phrase: spy satellites. Well, the
satellites and the upper stages of the rockets that got them to orbit.
May as well use the old cliché line, "we could tell you but then we'd have to
kill you." (Which I always thought was really "I could tell you, but
then 'they' would have to kill me.")
Never forget that Kenya was the origin of a previous pResident.
ReplyDeleteThey might just be trolling for funding!
A pristine bullet, I mean, space debris theory:
ReplyDeleteMinimal visible melting/scaring on the surface except for the what looks like melted plastic along the top. The gear-like cuts look factory fresh and no visible re-entry erosion on them like I'd expect to see. Reentry is how many degrees? And....no impact crater? Only XXX(x) mph upon contact with the ground, right?
Pull this one, it's got bells on it.
I figured the lack of an impact crater or other marks was because it had been moved. But that says nothing about all the other things that are weird about that picture. What weighs half a ton, and survives reentry at a couple of thousand degrees looking completely unburned? Cast iron would. Steel would. Who builds rockets out of steel or cast iron? It could be stainless, but Starships, for example, use a rather thin sheet; it wouldn't weigh 1100 pounds. Then look at the stick it's leaning on. Is that going to support half a ton? (Well, there is some weight on the ground, and the angle reduces the load quite a bit. Plus it's pretty straight. Maybe it's a pipe.)
Deletethere was a photo of what looked like it got partially buried in a grassy meadow, then as it was raised out of the ground, sorry don't recall where it was posted
DeleteDid anyone try stepping through it?
ReplyDeleteDiffer
Not me, I ain't goin' through there, un uh, no way, not me.
DeleteMaybe it's not space debris at all. Maybe it's from a piece of heavy equipment that got blown up and thrown into the sky.
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure I've read that a local thing like that has been ruled out.
DeleteFrom the last section of the source article: Over the years, this object has been tracked by the US military, which maintains a database of space objects so that active spacecraft can avoid collisions. Due to a lack of tracking stations near the equator, this object is only periodically observed. According to Langbroek, its last observation took place on December 23, when it was in a highly elliptical orbit, reaching a perigee of just 90 miles (146 km) from the Earth. This was a week before an object crashed into Kenya.
The argument about a scarcity of tracking stations near the equator not seeing it adds to the evidence it was part of that Ariane V SYLDA. Those missions from Ariane in French Guiana stay within 1.6 degrees of the equator.
Looks a bit link the cogged ring from a turret of an AFV...
ReplyDeleteI thought the same thing the more I pondered
DeleteDiffer
Kenyan Space Agency website has no mention of the ring under their news, events and updates. Agency's XTwitter site pinned a notice to ignore reports of "notification for compensation"; Kenya has attorneys. The Kenyan Space Agency investigation continues. Similar shaped debris crashed in India Apr 2022. Little impact damage, no crater. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-10684609/Metal-disk-rocket-launched-space-China-year-ago-crashes-Indian-village.html Wonder if the shape slowed it down? Wish someone in Kenya took better, more detailed pictures.
ReplyDeleteThey're still working on high-altitude flight testing for their astronaut corps.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, the best candidates keep falling out of the wheel wells of departing jetliners from Mombasa bound for NYFC.
They're like the Jamaican Bobsled Team, except without the comedy.
I suspect the "Kenyan Space Agency" is just an excuse to shovel Kenyan tax dollars to friends and relatives of officials in the Kenyan government. Kind of a turd world version of what happens in Mordor On The Potomac.
ReplyDeleteLooks like an excavator rotating gear to me
ReplyDeleteIs there a logo from Boeing on it?
ReplyDelete