Special Pages

Thursday, February 19, 2026

NASA Admin releases report on Starliner

We're approaching one year from the much delayed return of the Starliner astronauts, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams. It ended a 2-week mission that turned into more like nine months all because of the horrific performance of the Boeing Starliner capsule, and I find it interesting that both Butch and Suni retired before the end of 2025. 

Today, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman released a long-awaited summary of the mission. 

The headline is that NASA has classified the Starliner mission as a “Type A” mishap. That level is the most serious on the scale that goes from A down to D and one without a letter but that's minor.  The definition at the linked page (.pdf) is the direct cost of mission failure and property damage greater than or equal to $2,000,000 with two other conditions aimed at aircraft mishaps rather than spacecraft.

As part of the announcement, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman sent an agency-wide letter that recognized the shortcomings of both Starliner’s developer, Boeing, as well as the space agency itself. Starliner flew under the auspices of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, in which the agency procures astronaut transportation services to the International Space Station.

“We are taking ownership of our shortcomings,” Isaacman said.

It's a big departure from the talk last summer, as we went from the mission up to the station, through the decision to send the two back down on Crew-9's Crew Dragon - by cutting Crew-9 down to two in order to have seats on the Dragon for Butch and Suni to come back down on.  We had months of Boeing saying things like, “We just had an outstanding day” and their “confidence remains high” in the Starliner safely returning the two to Earth. Some of those statements have been wiped from Boeing's public-facing records.

In recognition of NASA taking ownership of its shortcomings, Isaacman went farther.

The letter and a subsequent news conference on Thursday afternoon were remarkable for the amount of accountability taken by NASA. Moreover, at Isaacman’s direction, the space agency released an internal report, comprising 311 pages, that details findings from the Program Investigation Team that looked into the Starliner flight.

“Starliner has design and engineering deficiencies that must be corrected, but the most troubling failure revealed by this investigation is not hardware,” Isaacman wrote in his letter to the NASA workforce. “It is decision-making and leadership that, if left unchecked, could create a culture incompatible with human spaceflight.”

Within weeks of their arrival back on Earth, the crew gave an interview in which they described exactly what they encountered and it was truly scary. Yes, there were moments when they were concerned about whether or not they would survive. 

The short version of what happened is that management - both NASA and Boeing - minimized every problem Starliner had, going back to its second orbital flight test in May 2022, two years before the manned flight. There were failures that should have raised huge red flags that systems on Starliner were seriously bad. 

However, in his letter to NASA employees, Isaacman said the NASA and Boeing investigations into these failures did not push hard enough to find the root cause of the thruster failures.

“The investigations often stopped at the proximate cause, treated it with a fix, or accepted the issue as an unexplained anomaly,” Isaacman said. “In some cases, the proximate-cause diagnosis itself was incorrect due to insufficient rigor in following the data to its logical conclusion.” 

This is about as good a description as you'll get of an arthritic, brainless and useless bureaucracy. The fact that Isaacman recognizes this is a very good sign. There's a lot of hard work to come before they can become a useful, solid engineering team.

At this time, there's another test flight planned for Starliner. Currently expected to be uncrewed and as soon as April. Asked about this, let's Isaacman isn't sure it's ready. He sees need for lots of more work. 

“We are committed to helping Boeing work through this problem, to remediate the technical challenges, to fully understand the risk associated with this vehicle, and to try and minimize it to the greatest extent possible,” he said. “And if we can implement a lot of the report recommendations, then we will fly again.”

For their part, Boeing says they're committed to being a commercial crew mission provider. 

Starliner docked to the ISS during June 2024's flight. Image credit: NASA



9 comments:

  1. How many times will they let that... unholy thing get anywhere near space before it kills people or they pull their craniums out of their rectums and just cancel it.

    Flight 1 had the same problems as Flight 2 and the same problems as Flight 3. Clearly the problems continue and there's no real fixes ever.

    Coincidentally, Suni has retired. I guess almost dying due to bureaucratic bullscat was enough for her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And Butch retired in August, four months before Suni did. She's going to be some sort of Guest of Honor at the Boston marathon this year.

      Delete
  2. They can do a million mea culpas and I still won't fly on that abomination. I'm not suicidal.

    Hey Rook, buy a clue and kill SLS while you're at it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rook's between a rock and a hard place. On the one side, SLS is the biggest and most expensive POS ever with no real back up ready. On the other side, the boss is saying beat the effin Chinese to the moon. It's not much of a chance, but it's the best chance they got.

      I didn't watch the whole WDR, but caught the last few minutes of the second countdown to T-33 seconds after this post last night. The guys at NASA Spaceflight were almost giddy over how well it went. The official press conference on that is at 11AM EST.

      https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/ has more info.

      Delete
    2. I'm concerned about SLS also. Looks to me like it's had even more red flags than Starliner did but it's still moving forward.

      If Trump wants to get to the moon, ask SpaceX to make a proposal. I'm sure a Falcon Heavy, Crew Dragon, and some modifications could do it far sooner than any other option.
      Jonathan

      Delete
  3. That sounds like an actual Root Cause Analysis. I am impressed someone had the spine to do the work. Such things - to be meaningful - must be complete and thorough; most companies and bureaucracies do not have the stomach for such honesty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Been through several of those, obviously before I retired 10 years ago. This was a hi-rel business (commercial avionics) and it comes with the territory. As this one shows, though, just because you say you're doing one doesn't mean it's going to help.

      Isaacman sounds like he knows this stuff and is going to make NASA act more like they should.

      Delete
    2. I've been through several, too. They're tediously painstaking, and a lot of work.

      Delete
  4. The new head of PR released a modified limited hangout, and nobody got fired, nobody got fined, and nobody went to prison for fraud. There was never any danger that the same people would not continue to receive the same tax money. That's why the new head of PR got confirmed, after a year of reassuring Congress he was ready to always wear his management hat.

    ReplyDelete