Special Pages

▼

Monday, November 9, 2026

SpaceX now an “infrastructure company” - says VP of launch

If you're a regular reader here, you'll have seen the name Kiko Dontchev, Vice President of launch for SpaceX. While they are obviously still in the process of development on Starship, the rest of their fleet was pretty much designed by the time the first Falcon Heavy launched in 2018. I'd be surprised if they haven't tweaked the designs of either the Heavy or the 9, usually referred to informally as "rev-ing" or revising, the design. While it's true that the vehicles themselves are probably touched less often than the infrastructure supporting their launch operations, I'm sure things like the Starship launch pads and Mechazilla arms get touched far more often than a Falcon 9 or Heavy. 

At last week’s UP.Summit conference in Florida, the vice president of launch at SpaceX, Kiko Dontchev, offered some of the most revealing comments to date about the company’s changing focus, how it is embracing AI, and why the Falcon 9 rocket—which has dominated global launch for a decade and remains the world’s preeminent launch vehicle—is firmly on the road to retirement.

“In the last couple years, when I talk about SpaceX, yes, we are a rocket company, but fundamentally we are an infrastructure company at this point,” Dontchev said. “We’re building infrastructure on the ground and low Earth orbit, soon on the Moon, and obviously eventually Mars.”

Earlier in the year, SpaceX acquired another of Elon Musk's companies, xAI, and while SpaceX engineers had been using AI to help them get more done, there's always a learning curve with such things. Dontchev says that it has really been starting to speed up accomplishments.

“What’s happened at SpaceX is we’ve really gone through a huge acceleration of adoption,” Dontchev said. “Even just a year ago, we weren’t adopting it that quickly, but really starting this year, we started to adopt it extremely rapidly. And the acceleration we have seen in our ability to do engineering is unlike anything I’ve ever seen at the company in my 16 years.” 

He goes on to say that tasks which would take would take hours to days now take seconds to minutes. Perhaps more surprisingly, it's also helping difficult "assembly and test" operations.

“We’ve automated being able to detect FOD,” he said. “We’ll have an inspector go in and borescope a tube, and we find that humans are about 94 percent perfect (at) finding a piece of it. Grok analyzing the same video is 99.9 percent perfect.” 

Seeing this, they've expanded the use of AI into inspection of Starlink customer terminals and other operations. Dontchev says the same improvements are following everywhere. And he says it will enhance efforts to get settlements going on Mars. 

Dontchev started at SpaceX before they flew the first Falcon 9 but has always been aiming for something better. You see, the second stage of every Falcon 9 that launches gets thrown away just like every other rocket family until Falcon started flying. Yes there have been boosters that have flown over 30 times;  B1067 flew its 36th flight back on July 9 but with the long term goal of being totally, rapidly reusable, not being able to get the second stage re-flying seems to have eaten at him.   

“Falcon 9, I love that rocket to heart,” he said. “I’ve launched many of them, all of them, in fact. But it’s still not fully reusable. We still throw that second stage away every single flight. Starship—we’re going to catch both the first stage and the second stage.”

When you think of their long term goals in the thousands of Starship launches per year, maybe 10,000 in a year, reusing everything certainly seems like what they've got to do. At some point, the cost and time associated with building second stages wipes out some of their desired launches. 

It is also significant that Dontchev spoke less about Starship’s payload capacity and more about its productivity per launch. The first orbital Starship launch, in late September, carried larger Starlink V3 satellites. And in the aggregate, this single mission carried 10 times the bandwidth of the Starlink payload launched by a Falcon 9.

Flying Starship from Florida, he said, will further improve capacity compared to Texas launches. Launching from Florida offers more favorable trajectories to certain orbits, potentially allowing Starship to carry more satellites without expending propellant on dogleg maneuvers. Dontchev said a single Florida Starship launch will be able to carry up to 20 times the bandwidth of a single Falcon 9. 

My favorite part of the interview was when he said, “We’re going to transport boosters and ships over barge here to the Cape. We’re hoping to actually do the first transports this year in December, and then maybe even fly by the end of the year.” 

Starship Flight Test 14 Monday morning, Sept. 28 from Starbase, Texas, looking north along the gulf coast. I want to see this from the backyard - even though it will be a smaller image. Image Credit: SpaceX



19 comments:

  1. Interesting. Maybe there's also a subtle message in this statement. Dontchev is talking about Florida being a preferred launch site for Starship, a few days after the new Texas Democrats made noises about cracking down on SpaceX.

    I'm not good at subtle messages, but maybe there's a hint of "we're pretty important to Texas, too. Don't make us unhappy". Maybe I'm just reading too much into things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The population of the area around Starbase voted to incorporate into the "City of Starbase, Texas" - https://www.starbase.texas.gov/ - last year (IIRC). It's hard to imagine the politicians are so stupid they don't realize that they get tourist traffic for these launches, but I probably give them too much credit.

      Delete
  2. I imagine Mr. Musk will be all too aware of the risks to his business of both the change in State governance and of the potential for a Federal government change in 2 years. He holds a lot of clout, given the importance of SpaceX to US National interests, but he won’t be underestimating the risks ahead. I’m confident he’ll prevail, but will it take further diversification of launch sites and infrastructure, perhaps outside the US? The key question would be where? Geographically and politically.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you see the X exchange last week when people posted things like, "we'll cut off SpaceX contracts" and Musk said something like, "cool! Give me a list of which contracts to cut and we'll stop work." Someone who has real inside knowledge posted, "everything SpaceX has done is the cheapest contract and performs the best." It seems to have shut the crazies down.

      While I'm sure buying up that chunk of Louisiana opens possibilities for Starship, if they're going to do thousands of launches per year, it doesn't seem like an ideal place. They have to overfly Florida on the way to orbit, or "hang a left when you get to 25 degrees north latitude." Geographically, it's hard to compete with the Cape, because it has launch directions over almost the entire Atlantic. Unless they build a second one a little farther south on Florida. They just need to avoid southernmost Florida, from Palm Beach south. The blue-est part of the state.

      Delete
    2. why does everyone always forget Floorida has a west (Gulf) side and, up to now we've managed to keep most of the Californicators and Nyew Yawkers out - and we've still a lot of inexpensive land to offer

      Delete
    3. For a launch site, the west coast is the wrong coast. They have to fly over the width of the state during the most precarious part of the flight. That makes FAA approvals harder to get.

      Delete
  3. Truly, it would be a shame if an outcome of the election was to hound Musk and his various companies effectively out of a state. Honestly, I keep waiting now to see when he just buys a country and moves everything there.

    It strikes me that his long term plan is to get all of this on the Moon or Mars someday, beyond the reach of any government. Shades of Pournelle and Heinlein.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Looking at videos of his robots, it seems that the idea behind the humanoid robots is to go get Mars ready for humans to settle there. None of those hard things to provide for the first people - like oxygen, water and food. The robots could get the place ready for the first people to settle Mars.

      Delete
  4. SpaceX should consider Australia. ITAR 126.7 gives Australia an exemption so most flights could launch from there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had to look up the latitudes that Australia spans, and I'd expect someone like Elon Musk would have tried that already. I guess there aren't many of those. I know of only one Australian rocket company, Gilmour Space Technologies, and of only one launch by them.

      Delete
    2. And Australia is run by the same moon-bats who "won" the recent elections in the US!!!

      Delete
    3. The Aussie moon-bats may even be worse than ours. Although that's kind of hard to guess at.

      Delete
    4. Agree Australian government is moonbatist. Still, Texas government will throttle SpaceX TX, Florida is capacity constrained, Louisiana will take some time to come online and the new Congress will seek to throttle SpaceX all across US. Good to have alternatives available.

      Delete
  5. From a geographical standpoint Brazil and Uruguay would be a good place to have launch facilities. Politics there probably would be a problem. Same with Madagascar on Africa's east coast. Just might be useful as club to beat some sense into a bunch of Luddite politicians.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. " Just might be useful as club to beat some sense into a bunch of Luddite politicians."

      Fascinating. I don't think it's possible for those people to learn. They keep preaching socialism, but everyone of them has to stick their hands in the fire no matter how many times they watch others get burned to death. Although they do seem to get away with all their crimes and it's exceptionally rare for a politician or Federal official of any kind to get arrested for something or other.

      Delete
  6. Bahamas.
    Suitable location, ability to support a deep water harbor. airports, launch facilities. But the risk of those pesky hurricanes. Still, no reason launch facilities could not be hardened.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Texan Democrats will tie him up in knots, he's gotta move.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Puerto Rico, the American Virgins, the Marshall's. I'd be amazed if there wasn't a spreadsheet in SpaceX somewhere with the advantages and disadvantages of each.

    ReplyDelete
  9. But you need the fuel, and the mainland has the advantage there.

    ReplyDelete