Special Pages

Saturday, August 26, 2023

To Err is Human...

I went through that phase of growing up where we start being called adults with a saying that started like that, but instead of ending with "to forgive, divine" it went:

To err is human but to really foul things up requires a computer.

Yes, it was the early days of computers, when the first microprocessor chips were coming out and as part of my daily job, I might have to enter a boot loader program in octal with toggle switches on the front panel, and once that was loaded, it would read its real program in with a paper tape machine.  It was even before the days of the sausage failure I wrote about in November of '20 (and is now, strangely enough, the #2 most read post in this blog's 13-1/2 years).  

Over the years, that has gotten used less and less - I suppose because we've gotten used to programmer's mistakes.  Nowadays, I say that quote as

To err is human but to really foul things up requires government.

Look no farther than Maui and how government at every level from Lahaina city to Maui island, to the state of Hawaii, to the fed.gov has a record unblemished by never doing anything; anything down to the smallest decision, right.  "No farther?"  I suppose that depends on where you live, but from where I live Maui is quite a bit farther away than the southern border, where, again, the feds have a record of not doing anything, down to the smallest decision, right.  Or just look at how the feds and most states handled Covid with lockdowns, masks and mandatory experimental vaccines.

Let me to be full of grace and append "that I know of" to those two statements.  Unnecessary, but I hate to be like them by making obvious mistakes. 

That said, what I want to make sure people know about what the coming "Covid crisis" means - and possibly transfer some thinking about it that I think is important.  Let me start with an example of the kind of things we know now that we didn't know "the first time".  This sort of data has been flowing as more and more countries are looking at how they managed the emergency and how badly they did.  

1 in 482 means 0.2% of the people in England that received a vaccine died within one month.  1 in 246 means 0.4% died within two months (60 days).  The last one I hesitate to include with this because it's open-ended.  It means 1.4% were dead by May 2022 with no separation by how long it had been since they were vaccinated.  Some of those were probably in the one month 0.2% and some were similarly in the 0.4%.  The whole thing depends on those deaths being from the vaccine and not from something else, but with a summary like this, we have no information.

It's important to know that every drug, and every other thing we put in our bodies has some fatality rate.  The question is always risk vs. benefit.  How many of those people would have died without the vaccine?  We don't know and those records are so contaminated (at least here in the US) that I think we can't know.  I've seen several estimates for the fatality rate of the virus and don't know if any are trustworthy.  The numbers I've seen have been in the same range as these percentages. 

Would you take a vaccine with a 1.4% chance of killing you to avoid a virus with a 0.2% chance of killing you?  That seems like a bad choice.  Note that it's a totally different decision in the case of something like an Ebola virus or something with an over 90% chance of killing you.  It certainly seems like overreach to tell people they will be cut off from everything and everyone if they don't take the 1.4% chance of being killed by the Covid vaccine and that's ignoring other things we've learned the vaccines have caused.  Not just Bell's palsy - Bell's was getting off easy, I'm talking the "died suddenly" epidemic, along with stillbirths, pregnant mothers dying, cancers now showing up and far more.

Masks?  In a summary of 14 mask studies, the CDC concluded that any benefit from masks is indistinguishable from random differences between groups of people.  At the same time, the leadership was mandating everyone wear masks to protect each other.  I did a post on this back in the earlier days of Covid, November of '20 (Original article at CDC).  I've done a few posts on masks and the studies they're based on really seem to say there might be a small positive effect but they're not what most people think.  The 2020 CDC study said as much in it's first page conclusions.  In bright red. 

Screen capture of the top of the first page of study, but I've lost track of where this came from.  It's clearly a YouTube video.



14 comments:

  1. Remember Swine Flu during the Carter Years? Soooo deadly they rushed an immunization through and required school children be vaccinated first. Then the deaths actually started due to the vaccine. You stood about a 25% chance of an adverse enough reaction to keep you home sick as a dog. And a small but much larger than actually dying from Swine Flu chance of dying from the vaccine. Pulled off the market within 2-4 weeks of issue.

    Yeah... Fun times. I was sick as a dog for weeks thanks to that poison.

    So glad the Government learned its lesson (sarcasm very implied.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lets be evenhanded here.
    Anyone who died that even tested with ANY covid was aa covid death, so anyone who died that got the notta-vax died because of the vaxx.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sigh. The data (I have a hard time even calling it that) is garbage without more context. What was the cause of death? In that same time frame, what would the normal rate of death be, keeping in mind the vaccinated population would probably be significantly skewed towards the elderly and infirm? Could the interpretation be that the vaccine did not cause excessive deaths, simply did not prevent them? Why is the third statement different on form from the others?

    There's a lot more needs to be known. Incomplete information like this causes more harm than good. I hate this kind of junk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...keeping in mind the vaccinated population would probably be significantly skewed towards the elderly and infirm..."
      Except that it was mandatory for .mil, (some) usgov and fed contractors, so probably a good enough cross section of society.to draw valid conclusions about efficacy and risk, had the data not been deliberately obfuscated and corrupted.

      Delete
  4. They've come up with another shot 100% mandatory for all US Citizens. I wonder how many sheep will take the shot?

    ReplyDelete
  5. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

    ReplyDelete
  6. There has been, AFAIK, exactly one "study" of mask effectiveness that actually tested mask effectiveness.
    Every other test, every single one, has obvious methodological flaws and variable gaps large enough to make the range of all results one of 0-∞, inclusive, making them as effective as a screen door on a submarine for determining anything of value.

    And anyone with a 10th-grade science education knows that, yet we have had Ph.D.s among TPTB still pimping obvious B.S. as if it was steak.

    That cancels out stupidity and ordinary bureaucratic incompetence, and leaves malign intent as the only adequate explanation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "To error is human, to forgive is against Battalion policy." 2/75 Inf (Ranger), 1977

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "To err is human, to forgive is not SAC policy!" USAF, '72-'76

      Delete
  8. If the goal was control and no ID mail in voting to ensure "Our Democracy" "won" then it was successful.

    It does seem ODD to me that the end of the last "Emergency" was announced by the Meat puppet in Chief over a month before it was "Ended" by Federal Edict. Pretty "Scientific" to know when the "Threat" was done.

    Now that we're heading back into election times OH NOOOOO!!! It's BACCCCCKKKK and about to become a Federal Edict (or proxies thereof).

    Measured by the results of states that didn't enforce mask mandates vs the control freak states that forced the mask mandates no measurable "improvement" I've ever seen.

    Normally as "vaccines" are deployed the higher a % of citizens (Subjects?) are vaccinated the LOWER the Disease effects.

    Has anybody seen this happy result? I've been to the funerals of several healthy mostly middle-aged outdoorsmen that passed with in 18 months of getting fully vaccinated and boosted. A small sample but concerning.

    Seems it's "Selection" err Election time, so it's masking for the dread disease time again.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You got me beat. I've typed in boot instructions at the console, for booting from 9-track. Ah, simpler times. Can I go back to the 80's?
    - Mr. Mayo

    ReplyDelete
  10. SiG, I had the Cold Boot Loader memorized for the IBM 1443 that I learned on back in '70. 11-bit word. Later I learned the Loader in a PDP-8 as well. The IBM used Hollerith cards, the PDP used punched tape (7-track).
    For that matter, I had to write the Console program for the IMSAI 8080 "personal computer" because all you got was the hardware. Had to burn it to a 2K PROM after debugging it thoroughly...
    Thems were the days!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. RE "the "died suddenly" epidemic"

    “If I Die, You Were Right” [his response on the alleged toxicity/lethality of CV19 "vaccines". Shortly after getting a CV19 jab he suddenly died] --- Doug Brignole, bodybuilder [https://archive.ph/1mnc8]

    "It used to be when someone died suddenly it meant they were in an accident. Every since they introduced the Covid vaccine even young children are dying suddenly." -- Lee Stevenson, December 2022

    Let's THINK now...

    What does the fact of a MUSHROOMING of over one million (often young) people who have "died suddenly" all over the globe SINCE the start of broad "vaccination" with toxic Covid jabs [https://archive.ph/8Ztz9] (deceitfully hidden by the medical mafia doctors as "sudden adult death syndrome") mean really?

    What does it squarely point to?

    What is the TRUE FINAL implication of all that, which is not mentioned here (or elsewhere typically)?

    ACTIVE resistance against the criminal establishments around the world will greatly increase the sooner someone TRULY understands that the ruling cabal and their minions (in governments, the UN, the WHO, big corporations, etc), anywhere around the globe, are PSYCHOPATHS -- the evidence is OVERWHELMINGLY ROBUST --- see “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” ... www.CovidTruthBeKnown.com (or https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html)

    And psychopaths are typically NOT how Hollywood propaganda movies have showcased them. And therefore one better RE-learns what a psychopath REALLY is. You'll then know why they exploit/harm everyone, why they want to control everyone and have been creating a new world order/global dictatorship, and many other formerly puzzling things will become very clear.

    But global rulership by psychopaths is only ONE part of the equation that makes up the destructive human condition as the article explains because there are TWO human pink elephants in the room... and they're MARRIED (see cited source above).

    “... normal and healthy discontent .. is being termed extremist.” -- Martin Luther King, Jr, 1929-1968, Civil Rights Activist

    If you have been injected with Covid jabs/bioweapons and are concerned, then verify what batch number you were injected with at https://tinyurl.com/ytthwrwm

    “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” --- Martin Luther King, Jr, 1929-1968, Civil Rights Activist

    "Unexpectedly died coincidentally of suddenly?" -- Unknown, December 2022

    The official narrative is… “trust official science” and "trust the authorities" but as with these and all other "official narratives" they want you to trust and believe …

    “We’ll know our Disinformation Program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” —William Casey, a former CIA director=a leading psychopathic criminal of the genocidal US regime

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hmmm, experimental medicine has deadly side effects? Say it isn't so!

    ReplyDelete