The first one is just because I think the picture is pretty.
SpaceX Return to Flight Set a Time Record
The return to flight approval from the FAA that was talked about in last night's post took place almost immediately. There were Falcon 9s loaded with Starlink satellites at both Vandenberg and Cape Canaveral and both launched early this morning.
One Falcon 9 lifted off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station’s Space Launch Complex 40 at 3:43 a.m. Eastern, placing 21 Starlink satellites into orbit. It was followed at 4:48 a.m. Eastern by another Falcon 9 lifting off from Vandenberg Space Force Base’s Space Launch Complex 4E, also delivering 21 Starlink satellites to low Earth orbit. The 65 minutes between launches is the shortest interval yet between Falcon 9 launches.
In the foreground is Pad 39A of the Kennedy Space Center, with a Falcon 9 and Polaris Dawn capsule waiting for their desired weather conditions. In the background of the long exposure shot, the Falcon 9 lifts off from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. SpaceX photo
NASA Awards $117 Million to Intuitive Machines for a 2027 Mission to Moon's South Pole
Remember the first Intuitive Machines probe to the moon last February, Odysseus - quickly nicknamed Odie? Odie got a lot of attention and coverage here on the blog. It was, after all, the first US launched vehicle to land on the moon since the end of the Apollo program when it landed on February 22nd. Granted that "Landing" is only accurate in the loosest sense of the word - the lander broke a leg on its final approach and tipped over. Because of that, the mission was a continuous string of what I call "asbestos moments" - doing "as best as they could with what they got" and Intuitive Machines reported every paying customer was happy with their results.
"The instruments on this newly awarded flight will help us achieve multiple scientific objectives and strengthen our understanding of the moon's environment," Chris Culbert, manager of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, said in a statement.
"For example, they'll help answer key questions about where volatiles — such as water, ice, or gas — are found on the lunar surface and measure radiation in the South Pole region, which could advance our exploration efforts on the moon and help us with continued exploration of Mars."
This is not the Next lander for IM, so it's not three years between missions. Their next lander, IM-2, is expected to
fly before the end of this year, also to the south pole area. It carries a
NASA payload called PRIME-1 (Polar Resources Ice Mining Experiment-1) that
will hunt for water ice, which is thought to be abundant in the area. IM-3
will follow next year. That means IM landers in '24, '25, and '27.
63 minutes seems a short time, but separated by the whole continent, not that surprising nor really big news, well, if it's SpaceX.
ReplyDeleteNow, do 63 minutes from two pads on the same coast, either at VSFB or at the Cape, or even at Boca Chica.
When will we see that launch cadence? Wouldn't be surprised to see it within this year, at least at the Cape.
Be really interesting to see how quickly SpaceX can load, launch, reset, load another rocket and relaunch from the same complex and same launcher. Which, again, wouldn't surprise me to see it within this year, at least from the Cape, maybe Vandy.
Wanna bet what Range Safety would do with your request?
DeleteRegardless of who was to try it...
Mark, Range Safety is local, they are not one big conglomerate - their only concern is what is "local" to their area. Now, the FAA, on the other hand...
Delete<.Beans was proposing two launches from the SAME launch site within 63 minutes. So that would be with the same Range Safety office. My post stands correct as is.
DeleteAs to the '2 launches from same launch site within 63 minutes of each other,' yeah, current Range Safety might have a stroke, or at least a headache, but...
DeleteHow quickly does the launch site become safe from fumes and stuff after a Falcon 9 launch? How much reset and repair does said launch site require?
If the answer to the first is negligible or '15 minutes or so' and the answer to the second is 'no real reset other than hooking things up' and include Range Safety in all parts of the process so RS can see there is actually no real issue, then eventually RS will come around and allow it.
Really, if there's no issues with the first launch, no reset problems, no environmental problems, and SpaceX is able to reset and reshoot that quickly, why not?
SpaceX could start with '24 hour launch cycle, from processing room to launch, reset pad, move next one out and launch' and then whittle the time down by an hour each new sequence.
I mean, they've got the launch pads there. The processing and assembly rooms there. The occasional need to launch rather rapidly. And all those technicians and engineers and the guys who watch the machines and such. Why not?
Yes, it's one thing to be careful. But you can be careful and follow procedures and still do it in a rapid fashion (unlike legacy aerospace where launching 6 times a year is considered 'fast pace.')
Polaris Dawn is going to be a fun one.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely. I want to stay as close to "plugged in" to that as I can.
DeleteNextSpaceflight.com is saying Wednesday morning at 3:38 AM ET. At some point, they need to take that Falcon 9 and Polaris Dawn capsule off the bad to make room on 39A for the Europa Clipper mission on a Falcon Heavy. They say Thursday October 10 for that.