Eight days ago as I write, Jan. 28, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) launched their version of a navigational satellite called NVS-02. Their Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) Mk II lifted off at 7:53 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (0053 UTC) from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre.
As is common in satellites above the lowest, easiest to achieve orbits, once the launch vehicle delivered the NVS-02 payload to the desired deployment altitude, an engine onboard was then set to fire to transfer the satellite to the desired orbit. On Sunday Feb. 2 the ISRO announced that due to a thruster failure on the satellite it was unable to reach its intended orbit.
According to a statement posted on ISRO’s website but not otherwise publicized by the agency, “the orbit raising operations towards positioning the satellite to the designated orbital slot could not be carried out as the valves for admitting the oxidizer to fire the thrusters for orbit raising did not open.”
ISRO goes on to say:
The satellite systems are healthy and the satellite is currently in elliptical orbit. Alternate mission strategies for utilising the satellite for navigation in an elliptical orbit is being worked out.
The big problem facing the satellite is that it's in an orbit that's unstable. The Space Track catalog maintained by the U.S. Space Force shows that the satellite remains in an orbit with a perigee of 165 kilometers and apogee of 37,582 kilometers. That perigee is barely over 100 miles and that's a height where atmospheric drag is a concern, especially in periods near solar max as we are now in. Solar storms can make the atmosphere expand which can increase drag a lot. Remember back in 2022 when a solar storm cost SpaceX 40 out of 49 satellites it had just launched? Those satellites had a perigee of approximately 210 kilometers, almost 50km higher than this one (or 130 miles) - and that wasn't even a strong solar storm.
Later in the day Sunday ISRO posted to X:
The main Liquid Apogee Motor (LAM) engine on the satellite remains in an unusable state, which is why ISRO is now going to attempt to use its Attitude Control System thrusters to slightly raise its perigee.
Any satellite with a perigee below 200 km is in a highly unstable orbit. The current perigee of NVS-02 is at 170 km.
ISRO will probably attempt to raise the perigee only somewhat above 200 km to put NVS-02 in a more stable orbit. It is highly doubtful whether they will be able to raise it all the way into a circular GSO orbit (which was the original destination).
The NVS-02 navigation satellite with its payload fairing before being encapsulated ahead of its Jan. 28 launch. Image credit: ISRO
Well, that sucks. Hope they fix the problem and do a better job next time.
ReplyDeleteSeconded!
DeleteSomebody is going to make a good buck, by developing a sat rescue vehicle. With the excellent launch pricing SpaceX and now others offer in itself, respectable savings in investment funds can be realized, leaves a lot of room and opens unlimited possibilities.
ReplyDeleteSpace is great, only going to become industrialized in relatively short time frames. And if what was found in the last asteroid material return mission is indicative of resources, would place money on a kind of outer-space gold rush. The raw materials seem to be there, thats only a minuscule sampling, imagine say large asteroids like Ceros contains the level of resources with which boring into it to build living space, pays its way with abundant viably mineable life related materials. Its a game changer if that reduces need for boosting supplies out of the earth-moon gravity well. Watching events, the way into commercially successful space presence, is getting close to being predominately private enterprise run, with .gov's part reducing in accordance. The trick right now is viable engine technology beyond chemical rockets, thats going to be the pivotal point. Would not be a bit surprised SpaceX is first to to do so. Via Musk's comments, they have viably reached the limit of chemical fueled physics, I'd contend its probably leading them in new directions, only makes common sense, they are seeing materials effects like no other, like Super Iteration R&D. "SIRD" for short. One clue, to my uneducated eyes, is how much light Raptor engines produce, (how SH makes NG look like it hardly can get out of its own way, maybe thats only a matter of engine count). That somehow that light energy output provides leads to new engine technology, i mean basically everything is made of light, right?
PS, "dust engines", you mine asteroid material, the dross remaining from smelting process, grind it into molecular sizes, thats your mass for an electric repulser rocket engine, uses a small onboard nuke reactor to charge your engine. TaDa! unlimited fuel source thats close to free, your reactors run comparatively long time, which submarines have now for decades proven tech, those reactors are relatively pretty small, plus in space no requirement for earth based shielding, simple reflector tech, or maybe simple super sized kind of thermal generators used on some research sats.
ReplyDeleteThat gets around lifting mass out of earth gravity. I have no idea how efficient the nuclear isotope generators are versus weight but the reduction of minerals to size needed is pretty large energy wise. Essentially it is a factor of surface area, that is if you increase surface area one hundred fold, it takes one hundred times the energy. It might be better to use comet material converted to gas. Trouble with that is there isn't a lot of comets between the sun and the gas giants orbits. It always comes down to Heinlein's "there's no such thing as a free lunch".
DeleteIt needs to be de-orbited. Unless they can ditch the motor to de-orbit on its own. The last thing we need is for it to explode on its outbound leg but still well inside GEO.
ReplyDelete