Thursday, July 25, 2024

What Do You Say We Start a New Space Race?

Yeah, I'm being facetious.  

An interesting little story surfaced this week that seems to confirm an idea that has recurred in the science fiction world many times.  Imagine some material is discovered in space that is precious and in limited quantities on Earth but is practically free for the taking on some planet, asteroid, or somewhere else in space. All one has to do is get to the supply and take control over it - suddenly, riches beyond imagination. First one to the supply to get ownership of it is "winner takes all."

The story is based on data from NASA's Mercury MESSENGER probe, the first probe ever sent to orbit the small planet. Briefly, the roughly 1.1 metric ton satellite was launched on August 3, 2004, and went into orbit of Mercury just over 6-1/2 years later, March 11, 2011. It orbited Mercury until April 30, 2015. 

Analysis of the data leads to the conclusion that Mercury seems to have a 10 mile thick layer of diamond beneath the crust of the tiny planet

Astronomers have long noted that Mercury is different from other rocky planets they've observed, like Earth or Venus. Differences include its very dark surface, and remarkably dense core. Additionally Mercury's volcanic era seems to have ended fairly quickly in the planet's life. 

Another difference noted is that patches of graphite, a two-dimensional or sheet form of pure carbon, appear to be common on the surface of the planet. These patches have led scientists to suggest that in Mercury's early history, the tiny planet had a carbon-rich magma ocean. This ocean would have floated to the surface, creating graphite patches and the dark-shaded hue of Mercury's surface. 

"True color" image of Mercury taken by MESSENGER - using various filters on the spacecraft's wide angle camera to balance the reflected colors. Image credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie

The same process would have also led to the formation of a carbon-rich mantle beneath the surface. The team behind these findings thinks that this mantle isn't graphene, as previously suspected, but is composed of another much more precious allotrope of carbon: diamond. 

"We calculate that, given the new estimate of the pressure at the mantle-core boundary, and knowing that Mercury is a carbon-rich planet, the carbon-bearing mineral that would form at the interface between mantle and core is diamond and not graphite," team member Olivier Namur, an associate professor at KU Leuven, told Space.com. "Our study uses geophysical data collected by the NASA MESSENGER spacecraft."

Over the years, more than a couple of sci-fi stories have thought about an asteroid or planetoid that was considered insanely valuable; say solid gold or some unobtainium metal. In this case we're faced with a problem that has happened many times on Earth (although an extreme example): suddenly a prospector discovers a never before seen quantity of a valuable gem stone.  A pragmatic, practical answer to what happens in such a case is that price is really determined by "supply and demand" and if an unlimited supply were to suddenly appear, the price would collapse. It's not uncommon to try to keep such finds secret to keep from disturbing the price.

A gemstone is rather harder to SWAG a value on, compared to a pure metal. In the case of diamonds, there are well established standards - the "four Cs" based on the size of the stone (weight in carats - 5 carats to the gram) color and clarity of the stone along with how well it has been cut. While I could SWAG a calculation of how many kilograms of diamonds would be in a 10 mile thick shell the diameter of Mercury full of diamond crystals, think of thousands of cubic miles of diamonds, the real value would depend on things that would just be more cascaded "wild-ass guesses" and would essentially be meaningless. Bringing it to Earth would shift the supply so drastically that there would be no demand left once they got here.



20 comments:

  1. Sorry, but a race between Space-X and NASA would be like sending the NBA Dream Teams to compete against all comers at the Special Olympics.

    Cut to the chase, and just sell mineral rights on Mercury to Elon Musk.

    He'll make his first trillion on the royalties from sales of product, while NASA is still working out how to go at night.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While I was in high school seemingly a hundred years ago (OK, late '60s) I read a short story by Asimov. There some "asteroid raiders" or some such, out illegally prospecting and found an asteroid of nearly pure uranium ore. Per the storyline of Asimov, the world government at the time had outlawed all possession of uranium, as it could be used for fission bombs (surprising that the story line was not all of it confiscated for power plants).
    Anyway, these pirate prospectors got caught trying to make a deal and got locked up, unable to get their gigantic payday. Kinda reminds me of the occasional hype around the asteroid 16 Psyche, which per some British tabloid has "quadrillions of dollars worth of iron, gold and other useful metals." No article ever mentions the collapse of the Earth-based prices due to rather huge supply all at once.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Asteroid metals are a lot more valuable where they sit, already out of a gravity well, where they can be used to build big things in space.

      Delete
    2. Riiiiiiiiiight.

      Just fly that giant ore smelter up to space, piece by piece.
      Then get back to us.

      Delete
    3. Asimov also proposed mining ice in space and dropping it very slowly onto Mars when future Earth shuts off water being sent to Mars and being used as reaction fuel in space ships to Mars.

      Basically take a bunch of ships to where ice asteroids or moonlets exist, find a big ice chunk, disassemble ships and just plug the pieces into the iceberg, and use melted water from the berg to take said berg out of its orbit and into a Mars intercept trajectory.

      It could work. Once we get nuclear teakettles working.

      Delete
    4. There is absolutely zero requirement that the first smelters in space be "giant". Like everything else in the world, we will start small and work our way up. I guarantee Elon Musk is thinking of this. He's not building a Starship factory assembly line, with plans for expansions to eventually build a Starship per day, for giggles and grins and because he like wasting money. The same people poo-pooing Starship are the same people that were poo-pooing SpaceX and Falcon 9 a decade ago.

      Delete
  3. Synthetic diamond is so cheap now it wouldn't pay the freight to bring it back except as a curiosity or scientific specimen.
    Boeing crew on ISS now forty five days with no return set. Hope they get double time for all after the first forty hours.
    Ole Grump

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lots of uses for diamond, the price won't automatically crash to zero or nearly nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's my understanding that the vast majority of diamond used industrially is synthetic. It seems hard to imagine they could bring tons back from Mercury cheaper than refining carbon in a furnace. Gems are a different world, where color and clarity matter the most. There's an element of things becoming a fad in there and if you can predict what's going to become a fad, you're way ahead of me!

      Delete
    2. Most industrial diamonds are synthetic because it's cheaper to make synthetic than pay DeBeers for industrial-grade diamonds. Bastards have centuries of production of all levels of diamonds locked away. Literally its everywhere, diamond is, but one conglomerate has a lock on world-wide production, to the point that said conglomeration will ruin anyone selling against the conglomeration. It's the only thing holding Russian diamonds from flooding the market, and being used inside Russia for industrial uses.
      They literally have to pay a license to the conglomerate to use their own damned diamonds.

      Delete
  5. Diamonds? DIAMONDS? They are one of the most common gemstones, found in large quantities in easily mined ground.

    Opals are far more rare in both number and locations they are found.

    Seriously, diamonds? Fugedaboutit.

    Transparent Aluminum (otherwise known as 'Sapphire' to all the non-idiots out there (seriously, Star Trak IV? Transparent aluminum? We (humans) have been making industrial quantities (size and strength) of sapphire for a long time) is far rarer in nature.

    Yeesh. Now do large quantities of tungsten or osmium or titanium or aluminum or even iron or molybdenum. You know, really useful stuff. Or silicon (really, glass-grade silicon that is easily obtainable is somewhat beginning to get somewhat scarce 'in the wild.'

    Not to mention the issues of solar radiation in the region in and around Mercury.

    This is like the idiots who get all worked up about astronomers finding super-Earths out there (twice or larger than actual-Earth.) So? Those planets either have so little iron and other heavy metals so lower gravity and no magnetic/radiation belt or iron and heavy metals like Earth so correspondingly higher gravity which is a no-bueno for life-as-we-know-it.

    Seriously. "Oooh, we found X and Y and Z in some completely inhospitable place that we can't get bupkis from." So? Remember when mining the ocean floor for gold was talked about? Or 'frozen' methane blobs? Or any other 'deep sea mining'?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've lived long enough that the pulp sci-fi of the fifties is now real: gleaming stainless steel rockets landing tail down on planets made of diamond.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 10 mile thick layer of diamond? How big of a single stone could you have? What could you do with it? Make a bridge across the English channel? Bringing it back would be a challenge. What could you do with it on Mercury? Make a hundred mile tall tall church spire? An interplanetary laser? Of course it might just be like gravel or sand, zillions of small diamonds. Or it might be one big stone. In that case just cutting out a useful piece might be a problem.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What makes you think that those who run the diamond trade on earth would tolerate anything that might risk the lining of their pockets?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. DeBeers et al will bankrupt governments in order to protect their monopoly.

      Delete
  9. Badgez? Badgez! I got to show you no steenkin' badgez! BANG BANG!
    You mean that kind of mentality and greed SHB?

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Another difference noted is that patches of graphite...'
    OMG we can't mine that
    Fossil fuels! Dinosaurs on mercury yet!
    Will Al Gore sell us his carbon credits?

    ReplyDelete
  11. A similar supply/demand example occurred at the end of WWII when military Graflex cameras were bulldozed. They had already been paid for, and the Graflex company was still in business selling the same product to the civilian market,

    ReplyDelete
  12. A South African American seizes control of the solar system diamond trade. Populates Mercury with Optimus (Optimi?) robots to mine the diamonds under hellish conditions.

    ReplyDelete