Sunday, September 21, 2025

What's the word for a rerun of a rerun?

Despite the major changes to the Federal Budget that have gone by since President Trump took office, I'm getting the feeling that it's all just "the same old bullshit" we've been going through for decades.  Yes, I'm reading of government shutdowns coming.  As usual, it's going to shutdown "if they can't agree to a budget."  Ars Technica (who are apparently 100% in the crowd that says, "yes cut the budget, but don't you DARE cut what I want!) summarized it this way: "In a win for science, NASA told to use House budget as shutdown looms."

The White House proposed a budget earlier this year with significant cuts for a number of agencies, including NASA. In the months since then, through the appropriations process, both the House and Senate have proposed their own budget templates. However, Congress has not passed a final budget, and the new fiscal year begins on October 1.

As a result of political wrangling over whether to pass a "continuing resolution" to fund the government before a final budget is passed, a government shutdown appears to be increasingly likely. 

While we haven't had an actual government shutdown in a few years, it's just the same old routine used all the time.  As for passing a budget, one of the actual duties assigned to the legislative branch, it still seems to be that the most recent Federal budget to be passed and signed was in 1997.  That's actually a polite and kind way of summing up the situation.  I say it's kind because it implies that congress has only been so bad in doing their jobs since 1997.  A better picture is conveyed by a quote attributed to South Carolina's Nikki Haley (governor at the time), "in the past 40 years, Congress has passed a pathetic four budgets on time."  

What they do that allows them to keep spending at nearly infinite levels is to pass those "continuing resolutions" mentioned in the first quote to legalize the spending.  

My guess is that if the media wasn't so tied up with the story about Charlie Kirk, they'd be blabbering about a looming government shut down, with the usual Gloom and Doom talk.  

Things like this recurring story are one of the reasons I've drastically cut back on the amount of politics and economics writing I used to do.  I'm so bored with writing about this, I'll just get to the essence of why I'm here.  If you want the long story, go to this 2023 post

So why do we go through this crap every time the subject comes up?  Political theater.  Kabuki (overly dramatic) theater.  They drag it out to the last minute so they can look like heroes.  If they shut down the Fed.gov, so what?  Those workers get their time off and their pay, so it's "no harm? no foul."  Feel sorry for them?  I think if one works for fed.gov, one should have a savings buffer of a few weeks to ensure you can buy your groceries in the event of a shutdown.  It's not like nobody knows a shutdown is coming. 

There's a cartoon I've been running for years, almost every reference to the debt ceiling since 2013, that I really think sums up the whole story.  In a way, a Star Wars parody reference.

Yup. They drag it out as long as they want, make it sound as dire as possible, all so that they can look like heroes, as in the last panel.  I went to the website referred to in the lower left of the cartoon and the web site appears to be gone, with a Vietnamese language site there.



11 comments:

  1. What do you call 'rerun of a rerun of a...'? Normal. It's more normal for Congress to actually shirk pretty much most of their actual Constitutionally-delegated responsibilities than for them to do said responsibilities.

    Budget? What budget? We need to pass Continuing Resolutions because we can hide garbage more better!!!! (yes, I know, bad Engrish, but have you heard the average congresscritter talk lately? When Fetterman makes more sense and uses better English, that's a scary thing!!!!)

    ReplyDelete
  2. My feeling is governments are a gathering of persons of low degree. I hold my nose and pretend it doesn't stink. That said. its what we got and we should change it for something better. But oh lord, the path there would be long and perilous. I am coming to the end of life which has been good beyond my dreams. My children, grand and great will see troubles beyond my imagination. I weep bitter tears that I cannot be there to shoulder some of that burden.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Train them up in the way they should go, it's the best you can do for them. All else is vanity, even money won't cure stoopid behavior...

      Delete
  3. Oh ye of little faith. Drink some covfefe. Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. Donald Trump knows more about using bankruptcy to his advantage than just about anyone else alive. If congress abrogates its responsibilities, Trump could pick up the pieces and work out a restructuring of debt and activities of the US. Everything. Exciting times. You ask for a miracle, I give you Donald J Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How much of the debt is owed to the Federal Reserve, and if we abrogate that "debt", would it be bad?

      Delete
    2. That's a tough one, Mark. I'm not sure I've seen anything clearly marked off like that. The Fed is a private bunch of banks that act as though they are the government's banks. They're the ones who issue the bonds the fed.gov sells and (AFAIK) they pay all the interest to the buyers. That implies that EVERY CENT of debt was issued by and so is owed to the Fed. I'm no accountant, and certainly not a lawyer, but I can easily imagine them influencing the lawmakers to keep them blame free, so that nobody ever tried to do this.

      Delete
  4. Well, maybe we could get a Texas judge to issue a *Writ of Mandamus* against Congress?

    It probably wouldn't work, but it might draw some public attention, and it would be fun to watch the little roaches scurry about.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Here is an easy plan to get rid of the Federal Debt. Pass a law tranferring the per capita Federal Debt to each individual residing in the United States (or claiming permanent resident status) as of the next Census Day. Your piece then becomes your personal debt. Arrangements must be made to pay it off. Public debt gone! Plus an amazing number of self deporting aliens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's too big. Never work. How long do you plan to collect it? Over the rest of the life of the population? What about interest on the debt that causes the amount due to go up instead of being paid off?

      According to the U.S. Debt Clock Total debt is $37.5 trillion and Wikipedia says the population of the US is 345 million. That's about $110,000 per person in the US, but that includes kids, and others with no income and can't work. The debt clock says $324,000 per taxpayer, but in both examples the problem is very, very few people could pay their share. Take that $110,000 (low end) estimate. How long before you could pay that off? The debt per person has to be scaled in some way to how much they could pay. I can hear the screams now.

      Balancing the budget itself won't work, the interest we must pay on the existing $37 trillion has to be paid, so we need to run surpluses for as far as the eye can see.

      Delete
    2. Some could pay their own piece - and that of family members. Some could borrow the money - maybe add it on to their mortgage. Some might set up payment plans (including interest). Some (maybe many) might default. If so, it is their personal default. The fact that some would pay would reduce the debt. And would a Federal government default on the Federal Debt be better? Do you see any way the .gov will pay it off? You are right it will never work - as any plan will never work. The willful malfeasance of the elected officials and their bureaucratic co-conspirators will see to that.

      Delete