Ergo, why should you believe them now?
There are some very simple reasons why the economy was essentially destined to start slowing down in the early 21st century. A recession was inevitable. Let me outline some reasons:
- The biggest demographic group in the country, the boomers, are entering retirement. As adults age, their spending slows for a couple of reasons: first, they tend to have a lot of stuff and don't need as much as twenty-somethings, and second, they look at their retirement preparations and start to save a lot more, crimping spending even more.
- The housing bubble was destined to pop. The stupid and corrupt practices that led to unqualified people getting loans have been well documented (for example). The essential thing to remember is that the historical requirements for a mortgage (that your payment was about 1/4 of your gross pay) were there for a reason: when it was followed, mortgages didn't default at a high rate. This, in turn, says that the price of an average house can't grow faster than an average salary grows, and the housing price was growing much faster. When that happens, people can't afford houses anymore.
- Generational cycles - sort of an extension of the first bullet point. In addition to simple curtailing of expenditures of the older generations, the students of this cycle assign a set of characteristics that describe the various living generations. While I'm not sure I like it as a general rule, it's predictive ability seems decent. A good summary from a financial planning firm is here. My version of the short summary goes like this: each generation differs from their parents and strives to not repeat their mistakes. Boomers were raised by "Ozzie and Harriet" or "Leave it to Beaver" parents ("Greatest Generation" WWII vets). The boomers became "both parents working" families with latchkey or daycare center kids. They did this to "get ahead" in a society where there was a lot of competition for every job. Their kids, Gen-X, are more likely to home school, have one parent at home more often, and are less likely to try to turn themselves inside out to "get ahead" than their parents. While boomers were the arch-type of the birth control generation, their kids are more likely to have more than just one or more than two kids than their parents. Because of this, they will have less to spend. Because they saw the excesses of their parents, they probably want to spend less.
- The incredibly profligate government spending was going to have to stop. Not stopping it 10 years ago has only made the need to stop it more dire.
I ran across the work of Strauss and Howe referenced on another site I read sometimes (www.urbansurvival.com) and spent quite a bit of time perusing their theories and explanations. Their ideas have had a big impact on the way I view unfolding events and the rhymes of history. I recognized your reference to "winter is coming" immediately without even needing to follow the links! =)ReplyDelete
I'm a genX-er myself, and my own life is almost exactly as you describe above. My parents were birth-control boomers - they had two kids (a boy and a girl) and both worked. My sister and I were both daycare kids and then latchkey kids, although for a couple of years my mom worked at the daycare that we attended. They tried to give us all the "stuff" that they never had. I sort of floundered through my young adulthood until I was forced to grow up after I married and joined the Army. Now my wife and I are almost the exact opposite of my parents - we have 9 children(!), she has a teaching degree but chooses to stay home and raise our children, and we've home schooled 1 and are working on it for the rest of them. My kids have less "stuff" than I did as a child, but our values as a family are very different than those of my family growing up.
I found it interesting reading these characteristics as predicted by Strauss and Howe and finding in retrospect how well they explained my own thinking on generations. In a way its comforting to know in advance that what we face is not entirely unique, and just like my great-grandparents (the Lost Generation) survived, so will we. (If the Lord tarries, that is)
Thanks for bringing this back to mind - its uncannily timely!
Thanks for the excellent, comment. And congrats on the baseball team, although they'll probably never all be of appropriate ages to play on the same field at the same time ;-)ReplyDelete
I find Strauss and Howe very interesting, like Kondratiev. From my seat, it looks like these are theories that are right in an overall sense, but that individuals in any generation may not be the archetype for their generation. Still, if 80% of a generation has those characteristics, the force of how they live will move society and history.
For example, if this is really a "fourth turning", people in midlife are expected to be nomads, but some may be prophets and some may be heroes, to use their terms. But if the majority of the people alive fill those roles, the future Strauss and Howe predict is likely.