First, for new visitors, I'm essentially a student of the Austrian school, rather than a Keynesian. That means I believe, as our constitution states, that money should be made from gold and silver; paper should be backed by that amount of gold and silver on demand - the way it was before 1973 when we broke all ties to the gold standard. It also means, among other things, that I'm deeply suspicious of the utility of creating worthless money, backed by nothing other than "we say it's a dollar, so it's a dollar". Anyone with any sense knows that the dollars they get are inherently worth less than the ones they are promised, yet they continue to take them. The Keynesian world economy is a dance in which every partner is insane and disgusting, and the only way to "win" is to end up with the least insane and least disgusting.
On a more practical level, even if you are a Keynesian, one of the fundamentals of economics is the marginal utility function - the idea that, for example, if you're broke, your first $20 bill has high utility, while if you're a billionaire, another $20 bill doesn't add much utility. If the first several trillion dollars were ineffective at turning things around, how many trillions will have to be created to make a difference? The more dollars there are, the less they're worth - which is the cause of inflation. How much inflation are they willing to create? Are they willing to go all Zimbabwe and reduce the value of the dollar to the value of the paper? That could be the outcome. At the very least, anything you've saved for retirement will be inflated away to nothing.
On the other hand, from Bernanke's seat, it could be the only alternative. The ECB is getting ready to print more to try to keep the EU from collapsing. And Romney has already said that if he's elected, Bernanke is gone. Although party platforms aren't really worth the paper they're printed on - no one is required to follow them (heck, no one is even required to read them) - the Stupid Platform says it's time to create a committee to study getting back on the gold standard - something last done during the Reagan administration. (See "Could the US Return to a Gold Standard" for some thoughts). Since releasing an enormous amount of money is going to do something, perhaps that's enough to force Bernanke's hand, and have him do it. Personal survival/job security. He doesn't have to fix the economy, he just has to make it look good enough to get Bamster reelected.
You have to admit, the timing is perfect. Not just a Friday press release, but a Friday on a holiday weekend? This is when they tend to drop the bombs, after all.
"We Say So" corporate money also known as FRN is not looking good. The promises that backed them are getting ragged, and the creditors are beginning to realize that our real exchange rate is approaching the level of the ruble. We squandered our birthright, and overextended our finances with the pipe dream of achieving equal result through government intervention. When a currency or barter transaction becomes too onesided, noone will be eager to accept a shallow promise, and deep debt for goods or services that contain real value. I for one, would like to see the real inventory at Ft Knox, and other depositories. It wouldn't suprize me to find the cupboard bare.ReplyDelete
Can't fault a thing you say.Delete
The only reason our dollar has any value on the world stage is because it's the reserve currency. Other countries (Search on "BRIC") are trying to end that.