THE PURPOSE OF THIS BILATERAL MODIFICATION IS TO EXTEND THE DEMO-2 FLIGHT TEST FROM TWO WEEKS TO UP TO 119 DAYS AND ADD THE REQUIREMENT FOR 45TH OPERATIONS GROUP DETACHMENT 3 (DET-3) JOINT TEST TRAINING FOR PCM-1 THROUGH PCM-6 IN EXCHANGE FOR ALLOWING REUSE OF THE FALCON 9 LAUNCH VEHICLE AND CREW DRAGON SPACECRAFT BEGINNING WITH PCM-2. [BOLD added - SiG]My own view, worth nothing, is that a once-flown booster is probably the peak of reliability; everything has been thoroughly tested, then thoroughly reinspected afterward. Obviously, the Demo 2 test mission isn't over until the capsule reenters the atmosphere, splashes down in the Atlantic, and the crew is safe and sound on board the recovery ship. That should be the weekend of September 26th, if the Days From Date Calculator isn't mistaken. The crew for the next Crew Dragon mission is already in training and undoubtedly has been in training for quite a while; Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken were assigned to this mission and worked with SpaceX for five years before this flight.
Jim Bridenstine, explained during a pre-launch briefing that the next flight of the Crew Dragon could fly as soon as August 30. That flight, called Crew-1, would see the Dragon carry four astronauts to the space station for a six-month stay. On board will be three NASA astronauts — Mike Hopkins, Victor Glover, and Shannon Walker — who will be joined by Japanese astronaut Soichi Noguchi.Meanwhile, work on preparing to resume testing the Starship prototypes continues. The debris from SN4's RUD was largely cleared away the next day and the work of rebuilding all the damaged hardware has been underway. The cause of the explosion was quickly isolated to Ground Support Equipment, a Quick Disconnect panel that's supposed to ease connecting and disconnecting fuel lines. It's an assembly like this one, although this particular QD is on the Starhopper that flew last summer.
Shortly after a post-launch briefing celebrating and discussing SpaceX’s inaugural astronaut launch on May 30th, Reuters reporter Joey Roulette was able to ask Musk about Starship SN4’s spectacular demise the day prior. The SpaceX CEO was quoted saying that “what we thought was going to be a minor test of a quick disconnect ended up being a big problem”, confirming suspicions based on careful analysis of public views of the explosion that it was caused by issues with Starship’s ground support equipment (GSE).Reading the LabPadre video sidebar, it seems there was hope of moving SN5 to the test stand today but those plans were scuttled and the road closure postponed until Thursday, June 11, at 6AM to 2PM CDT.
Meanwhile, in addition to the Starship testing in Texas, SpaceX has their first four-launch month scheduled. Four in a month isn't a huge improvement; their previous busiest was four launches in 32 days, but it's indicative of a continuing emphasis on getting better at what they do and improving their launch tempo. Those are:
(the first launch was Wednesday night, June 3rd)With a June 30th launch - as usual, a “No Earlier Than” date - it doesn't take much of a delay to push that into July, but July 3rd is 30 days later, just not a calendar month. It's interesting to watch, not so much for the milestone of four launches in a calendar month but seeing the cadence they're attempting to hold. SpaceX has 14 commercial launches scheduled in the second half of 2020, while an additional 20-24 Starlink launches were talked about at the start of the year. So far, they're off their stated goals, with it looking more likely they'll get 18 Starlink launches.
June 12 – 9th Starlink launch
June 24 – 10th Starlink launch
June 30 – GPS-III-SV03 launch
SpaceX's Boca Chica, Texas, production and test facility. From Elon Musk. There's talk of building something the size of NASA's Vehicle Assembly Building to accommodate the Starship Heavy that is in development now.
They sure figured out what caused the failure quickly! "GSE" is a world of it's own. It covers an astounding variety of equipment, from the environmental cooling units for the Payload Accommodation to the power supplies used to charge the LV and SC batteries, to all kinds of other things I only heard of in passing.
ReplyDeleteAnd flying used boosters for manned missions is probably shaking up a bunch of people in other companies.....
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteSpaceX is doing amazing things in the field of space flight! They are the disruptor to the staid aerospace companies; the status quo needed a good shaking up.
ReplyDeleteSpaceX's method of development is probably less costly overall than the methods employed by the old line companies. The SLS has spent close to $20 Billion and has had no unplanned failures but has had no demonstrable success. I don't think SpaceX has yet to spend $1 Billion and is closer to flight testing than SLS.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete