Tuesday, October 24, 2023

As Voyagers 1 and 2 turn 46, a software patch

Voyager 2 launched on August 20, with Voyager 1 following 16 days later on September 5, 1977, which means the two probes turned 46 just over a month ago.  Put another way, they entered the 46th year of their four year missions.  

Forty-six years in deep space have taken their toll on NASA's twin Voyager spacecraft. Their antiquated computers sometimes do puzzling things, their thrusters are wearing out, and their fuel lines are becoming clogged. Around half of their science instruments no longer return data, and their power levels are declining.

All that said, they are the farthest any objects from Earth mankind has gotten.  The backwards order of their launch with Voyager 2 starting out 16 days ahead of Voyager 1, and so being farther from Earth, was reversed early in the mission when Voyager 1 was given a shorter, more direct path to Jupiter and then Saturn while Voyager 2 was sent on path that would allow it to visit all four "gas giant" outer planets and the first human visits to Uranus and Neptune.  

Today, Voyager 1 is farthest from Earth, not quite 22-1/2 light hours from Earth, over 15 billion miles.  Voyager 2 is "just" 18.7 light hours.  This is only far compared to our day to day lives; the nearest stars are 4.3 light years away, closer to 37,700 light hours.  It will take the Voyager 1 over 77,000 years to get that far.  

Still, the lean team of engineers and scientists working on the Voyager program at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory are taking steps to eke out every bit of life from the only two spacecraft flying in interstellar space, the vast volume of dilute gas outside the influence of the Sun's solar wind.

"These are measures that we're trying to take to extend the life of the mission," said Suzanne Dodd, Voyager project manager at JPL, in an interview with Ars.

Voyager's instruments are studying cosmic rays, the magnetic field, and the plasma environment in interstellar space. They're not taking pictures anymore. Both probes have traveled beyond the heliopause, where the flow of particles emanating from the Sun runs into the interstellar medium.

"These two spacecraft are still operating, still returning uniquely valuable science data, and every extra day we get data back is a blessing," Dodd said.

We know that spacecraft designers love redundancy - backup systems for everything.  Both Voyagers are out of backups and running "single-string."  Power is decreasing at about 4 Watts per year as their Radioisotope Thermal Generators' fuel is decaying with age.  Much of the two satellites has been turned off already.  Will they make it to 50 years?  For 46 years they've been one little piece of space rock or meteor away from death.  Same as today.  It's the slow decay of various parts that's the problem.  

Over the weekend, ground controllers at JPL planned to uplink a software patch to Voyager 2. It's a test before the ground team sends the same patch to Voyager 1 to resolve a problem with one of its onboard computers. This problem first cropped up in 2022, when engineers noticed the computer responsible for orienting the Voyager 1 spacecraft was sending down garbled status reports despite otherwise operating normally. It turns out the computer somehow entered an incorrect mode, according to NASA.

Managers wanted to try the patch on Voyager 2 before transmitting it to Voyager 1, which is flying farther from Earth, deeper into interstellar space. That makes observations of the environment around Voyager 1 more valuable to scientists.

During the SW development, the engineers developed a different way to use the spacecrafts' thrusters.  The thrusters fire occasionally to keep the high gain antenna pointed back at Earth and the buildup of hydrazine residue in the fuel lines is becoming problematic.  Engineers beamed up fresh commands to the spacecraft in the last few weeks to allow the probes to rotate slightly further in each direction before firing the thrusters.  This means the engines will make fewer but longer burns.  The issue there is the longer burns might make the residue problem worse,.

With these steps, engineers expect the propellant inlet tubes won't become completely blocked for at least five more years, and "possibly much longer," NASA said. There are other things engineers could try to further extend the lifetime of the thrusters.

“This far into the mission, the engineering team is being faced with a lot of challenges for which we just don’t have a playbook,” said Linda Spilker, Voyager project scientist at JPL, in a statement. “But they continue to come up with creative solutions.”

The major subsystems of the Voyagers.  NASA/JPL-Caltech image.

The power decrease with aging has been planned for all along since it's a very predictable aging curve.  That aspect of aging is stable.  Earlier this year, engineers bypassed a voltage regulator on Voyager 2 to allow the spacecraft to draw on more power (there's always power loss in a voltage regulator). This means they expect that ground controllers won't have to shut off one of Voyager 2's five remaining science instruments until 2026, after previously expecting to deactivate one of the instruments this year. Dodd said ground teams will do the same with Voyager 1, which only has four active instruments, and therefore uses less power.

If you only look at the power situation, the Voyagers should make it until 2030, and maybe slightly longer, before the decay of the plutonium power source forces NASA to switch off all their science instruments.

"The transmitter takes about 200 watts of power, so once we get down to that level of power, that will be the end of the mission," Dodd said.

Even when they stop working, NASA's Voyagers will continue on to the stars.

"A lot of things could break before we run out of power," she told Ars. "Just like this thruster issue sort of popped up, there are a lot of other issues that could pop up and cause a mission to fail."

I've said before that I think of the Voyagers as the crowning accomplishment of NASA and among the coolest things ever done in human history.  I hope they make it to 50 years in 2027.  

Closing words to Suzanne Dodd, Voyager project manager. 

"They've overcome lots of issues, and the engineers have been very clever in overcoming those issues," Dodd said. "I think the focus now is let's get to 50 and have the biggest party we can."



20 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. At least the Voyager program is still generating new knowledge. I'd much rather pay for that than yet another bound-to-make-things-worse social program.

      Delete
    2. Ah, but the watermelons prefer the social programs, and THE run the government today. Besides, the Voyagers have nukes on board!

      Delete
    3. Yeah, think of all that money that has left earth. Why, just think of all the multi-generation welfare queens it could have supported.

      Delete
    4. 'A waste of money.'
      Oh sure, you are probably one who thinks that projects shot into space is money that left the planet. No longer available for welfare 'free money' because it left da earf.

      Delete
  2. It is impressive that so many of the Voyagers' systems are still running and returning data. By their launch dates, the computer systems are clearly pre- DOS, Win or Mac, so I wonder what kind of operating system they run on. And what processors power these instruments? The processors must have transistors way larger than 200 nm - assume that's an advantage while being exposed to space for 46 years.
    Thanks for the cool Voyager history SIG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Purpose built computer systems such as the Voyagers would use a uniquely created master control program/OS. General purpose OS's such as MS Windows, DOS, MAC or Unix/Linux are too bulky for such a system.

      Delete
    2. Considering they launched in '77, they were probably designed without microprocessor. Back when the computer's processor was a circuit board made from discrete logic.

      I should look into this. They're probably machine language only, or a simple assembler of some kind.

      Delete
    3. BillB's comment came in as I was typing mine. He said it better.

      Delete
    4. NASA has some history on the Voyager and some other unmanned spacecraft computer systems.

      Delete
  3. The Voyager CPUs are 1805's, heavily doped to be rad-hard. At the time they were the only CPUs that could survive the radiation. The clocks were deliberately slowed to assist in error prevention. Yes, they used a custom OS that was slim and trim due to what we today would consider crippling limitations! All machine language because it was tiny/compact and efficient. Think of the Apollo computer and it's noun/verb programming arrangement and you begin to get the idea...
    (Two of my professors in college were ex-JPL and worked on various space probe systems, and I also had the proud privilege of working with Maurice Stribling who was one of the programmers! Guy had 5 (five!) PhDs...)

    I was very lucky to be able to rub shoulders with these guys!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My bad, 1802's - I chalk it up to bad memory. ;P

      Delete
  4. An interesting aside. The guy who developed the radio communications protocols for Voyager is Joe Taylor from Princeton (won a Nobel for Pulsars).
    His work is very much in use by amateur radio operators - we can get a signal around the world with only a few watts of power.

    Needless to say, this is very bandwidth limited but it is doable and a very fun mode to operate.

    https://phy.princeton.edu/people/joseph-taylor
    https://wsjt.sourceforge.io/wsjtx.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that in the last year, virtually 100% of my time on the air has been spent in WSJT-X. I know there were one or two CW contacts, but that's all. Not one SSB contact. It's news to me that Joe developed the communications for Voyager.

      BTW, an objection to the digital modes is that they're "not real radio". Too curt, no conversation, just a few programmed exchanges. But the protocol itself is open source and some guys have developed a "conversational" mode called JS8, that's supposed to be as good at extracting signals from the noise, but allows more conversation.

      I hear good things about it, but they say it's very rarely used and I've never tried it.

      Delete
  5. Question: as Vger races through the cosmos at 17,892 mph over 15 Billion miles from earf, decay of 4 watts/year, how is comms transmitted and received?

    What wave length, pointed where exactly?

    An analogy; I'm shooting at jack rabbits. My zero is +/- 0.005 mm.
    Rabbits travel at known c, but oblique to my perspective. What is the chance of my one pellet measuring 0.00015mm impacting at desired point?

    Having near zero knowledge of radio (you wouldn't believe how much I've forgotten, I hardly believe it myself. I once held licensed SSB) I wonder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Further, it seems to me, given rate of decay, transmission would have to take into account that decay over time to receive to not blow out the antenna.
      (assuming the antenna is energized)

      Delete
    2. You might find this 2017 post interesting - it's a look at Voyager from the perspective of designing an RF system. Link budgets, signal levels, and all that.

      Voyagers use S-band (2.3 GHz) and X-band (8.4 GHz). Since that post is six years old, the numbers for path loss aren't as accurate as they were then, but since significant changes in distance (like doubling it) are probably what's needed to lose the link, we're not talking that big a difference.

      A rule of thumb is that to double the signal received, you need to double the amount of metal in the air. Hams do that by stacking identical antennas, but a yagi beam could also be made twice as long with twice as many elements. Here, you're talking about the biggest dish antennas on the planet so you're not going to double their size. We can, though, use two antennas in different countries or different continents - as long as they both have the Voyager above their horizon.

      Oh, and Voyager has an antenna nowhere remotely as big as those on the ground. It's radio beam is enormously wide in comparison. I wouldn't be surprised if their radio beamwidth was wider than a few Earths.

      Delete
  6. It would be funny/not funny if hackers sent a message from Vger to JPL;

    We've been trying to reach you about your extended warranty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "...as long as your spacecraft is less than 25 years old, we can cover it"

      Delete
    2. SiG, I say, keep this thread open without expiry. Leep it open as long as Vger. Who knows what will come? Engineers managining Vger today were born AFTER Voyager launched!

      I've shared this with my brother
      He was involved in spectrometers onboard Vger. He characterized his contacts at JPL as smart but lazy.

      Delete