Why? The polls consistently show independents are breaking very strongly for Romney, and the independents are what the whole election is about. Rs and Ds are expected to vote for their guy around 90% of the time, it's the swing state independents that will decide this - as they always seem to. Buried in a CNN poll that says the two are tied 49-49, it says
But a figure buried in the report shows Romney leading Obama among likely independent voters, 54 percent to 40 percent.It's not just there:
A poll conducted two weeks ago by Democracy Corps showed Romney with a 15-point lead among independents, 53 percent to 38 percent.How do they keep coming to the conclusion the results are split evenly? By oversampling Democrats over Republicans. Throughout this cycle, the major polling organizations have sampled with the same turnout as the 2008 election. The problem is that 2008 was a record turnout for Democrats and a lot of Republicans sat it out. Why would they think every election will be the same?
Let's say you went to your favorite lake and caught the elusive world record bass. Or you went to your favorite place to hunt and shot the world's biggest elk or caribou. Would you think that from now on they'll all be that size? That's what they're doing.
The truth is that the pollsters have been really awful at judging elections recently - especially those involving Tea Party favorites. Take Ted Cruz from Texas. In his runoff election, against a very entrenched, very establishment Republican, he won by over 13%.
Remember the Chick-Fil-A day? When someone said, "hey, let's do a day where everyone buys Chick-Fil-A to support free speech" and the country turned out in insane record numbers. People waited in line hours for the chance to spend money there. Some stores ran out of food. I see parallels in the crowds between Chick-Fil-A and Romney's voters.
Piling all of this together, factor in the apparent enthusiasm gap (a concert for Obama featuring Stevie Wonder drew only 200, while Romney shows up at the Dubuque, Iowa, airport and drew 2000) the return of the "broken glass Republicans" and I just don't see this as being as close as they say.
It could be that everything I think I know is wrong, too. Hopefully, we'll know by Wednesday morning. The last thing I want to see is a repeat of Florida 2000, or worse. We don't need the Stewart Smalley effect.
Hmm. If the above is true (who are "independent voters?) then it would seem that A Large Number of those who previously voted for obama now support obamney. We are in a world of trouble.ReplyDelete
GOD, help us.
Yup. You're absolutely right. An uncomfortably large percentage of "independents" choose our government. Another way of saying "independent" is "doesn't have any strong convictions or beliefs".Delete
God help us, indeed.
Mr. Greybeard, I must object to your description of independent voters as lacking in convictions and beliefs. I am an independant votor who is anti-offensive war but pro-strong military, entirely for laissez-faire unregulated business, against fiat money, pro-gay marriage, agnostic yet deeply spiritual and respectful of most religions, for the conservation of our wild territory but NOT an environazi, for strict constitutional restraints on government, and for the abolition of forced state education. Find me a party or even a candidate to vote for on my convictions, sir. The best I can do is Gary Johnson this time around, so he'll have my vote, even though he hasn't a snowball's chance. It would be a violation of my principles to punch my ballot otherwise.ReplyDelete
Yeah - My apologies. I can do some really suck-o writing, hopefully only rarely, and that was one. I meant to write undecideds, not independent, which is very different.Delete
No excuses - I effed up.
Romney doesn't just have to beat Obama....he has toReplyDelete
beat him by a large enough margin to overcome the
"margin of cheat" that the democratic/ACORN/SEIU
political machine has created over the past decade.
Not that I think it makes a lick of difference but I think mittens will lose by a small margin. I'm a disenfranchised Obama voter who voted for him again! I just couldn't bring myself to vote for the RINO with the history of voting for gun control and increasing government interference in peoples lives. Hearing Gary Johnson talking about legalizing Marijuana and in the same freaking breath talk about needing to tax and regulate it (is there a LINO? Libertarian In Name Only). I don't think Obama is going to fix anything but Ryan giving the 55+ crowd a pass on social security reform while screwing us young folks is only going to absolve those who caused many of the budget problems.ReplyDelete
Focus on your local elections and make those votes count.