Tuesday, July 5, 2022

CAPSTONE Is In Trouble

Last week's CAPSTONE mission (Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment) got off to an impressive start.  The Rocket Lab Electron booster functioned flawlessly and the Electron's Photon upper stage gently goosed the orbit a bit higher, firing seven times at key points to raise the orbit’s highest point to around 810,000 miles from Earth before releasing the CAPSTONE CubeSat on its ballistic lunar transfer trajectory to the Moon.  As we posted last Tuesday, it wasn't going to reach the desired orbit until early November, four months from now, so it has a long way to go.

Today, I started seeing rumors online that the capsule might be lost.  I checked the Artemis blog page for it, finding that as of mid-morning, it still had yesterday morning's post saying everything is proceeding normally.  

That was until about 12:30 ET today.  

Following successful deployment and start of spacecraft commissioning on July 4, the Cislunar Autonomous Positioning System Technology Operations and Navigation Experiment (CAPSTONE) spacecraft experienced communications issues while in contact with the Deep Space Network. The spacecraft team currently is working to understand the cause and re-establish contact. The team has good trajectory data for the spacecraft based on the first full and second partial ground station pass with the Deep Space Network. If needed, the mission has enough fuel to delay the initial post separation trajectory correction maneuver for several days. Additional updates will be provided as soon as possible.

Like the vast majority of spacecraft, there's no going out on a service call to fix it.  It's even tough to do the Universal Software Fix and turn it off and on again.  On the other hand, the teams that do this sort of mission for a living start thinking about what can go wrong and how to address it long before the satellite hardware is first built.  They often come up with ways around problems.  

Probably the champion example in this field is the nearly 45 year old Voyager 2 probe, now in its extended mission.  The "official" mission, the one that was sold to congress was a flyby of Jupiter and Saturn, and that ended 1981.  Voyager 2 launched in August of 1977.  The following April, not even one year into its mission, a capacitor failed in a frequency synthesizer.  It was the receiver's tracking loop, used to tune the receiver to remove Doppler shift effects from the relative motion of the earth rotating and the satellite receding.  The fix was to calculate what the frequency shift would be at the satellite, and then adjust the transmit signal frequency during transmissions to it.  Compensate it on the ground instead of in the satellite.  Voyager has been flying handicapped by not having that circuit since 1978.  Here's hoping they find a way around CAPSTONE's issue, too.

CAPSTONE revealed in lunar Sunrise: CAPSTONE will fly in cislunar space – the orbital space near and around the Moon. The mission will demonstrate an innovative spacecraft-to-spacecraft navigation solution at the Moon from a near rectilinear halo orbit slated for Artemis’ Gateway. Credits: Illustration by NASA/Daniel Rutter 

EDIT TO ADD:  Contact with CAPSTONE has been re-established as of an 11:30 AM, 7/6/22 update at that link.  Updated 5:15 PM - SiG.     


 

8 comments:

  1. It's possible that a future lunar mission could fix it??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It doesn't seem likely for a couple of reasons. First, it's going into a unique orbit that is unlike anything else up there. Testing out that orbit is the whole purpose for the mission, but it's not actually in that orbit now. As I understand it, it's in very eccentric ellipse with its apogee several times the geosynchronous orbit.

      Second: assume we have maneuverable vehicle that could carry a crew and get to it without the same kind of "four months to get there" that it's going through now. Then the satellite had to have been built to take apart in space for replacement parts. Given that it's a lower budget mission, I don't see that having been done.

      Delete
  2. 810,000 miles seems a bit high considering the Earth to Moon distance is approximately 240,000 miles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nuke Road WarriorJuly 6, 2022 at 11:22 AM

      Did not mean to post as Anonymous, forgot to change name-Nuke Road Warrior

      Delete
    2. I think the 810k miles comes from it going temporarily to (or near?) the L2 Lagrange point. The Webb telescope is orbiting out there and it's over 900,000 miles. There's a video on YouTube that talks about the derivation of the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit and they start with an L2 orbit.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5O77OV9_ek

      I haven't seen a map showing exactly how this one gets to it's NRHO and I don't know if it actually has to go the L2 point.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Reviewed the mission status reports via the NASA CAPSTONE site. The problem was (as analyzed):
    1) Somebody sent an improperly formatted command which knocked communications (Hi-gain) system offline.
    2) the watchdog timer that was supposed to kick the (Hi-gain) into restarting didn't. Software error. The main system software watchdog timer finally smacked the system into restarting...
    The problem has been addressed. The spacecraft was in no real danger, as a matter of fact several autonomous functions (course corrections??) occurred properly while it was "out-of-contact".
    Who wrote the software, Boeing?!?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the update. Thankfully, the layers of things that self-correct worked out this time.

      In my line of work, there was always a software Quality Assurance effort, so I've seen instances of the software being written exactly like the requirements said, tested and verified by QA, but still not doing what it was supposed to.

      Delete