Interesting - but more of a business story than a space exploration story. Perhaps even a story that shows even the Fed.gov sometimes does something right. A Tweet by Aviation Week reporter Irene Klotz
shows that SpaceX has moved ahead of every other major aerospace company in
the US to become NASA’s largest for-profit vendor. In particular, between FY '21 and '22, SpaceX leapfrogged past Boeing. While business with Boeing grew from 1.681 to $1.718 billion, 2.2% growth, SpaceX's business grew from 1.629 to $2.044 billion, 25.5%. Over 11 times more growth.
As you can see from her data, only the California Institute of Technology and its Jet Propulsion Laboratory gathered more funding. Their increase was around midway between Boeing's and SpaceX's at 12.3%. The JPL runs the majority of NASA's deep space missions, like the Mars rovers, satellites around Jupiter, Saturn, and many of those other famous probes you know of.
The main reason for SpaceX's growth, of course, has been their success with Crew Dragon bringing manned spaceflight back to the US, Cargo Dragon for carrying supplies the Space Station, and the failure of Boeing's Starliner to achieve operational status. When NASA awarded the contracts to both SpaceX and Boeing back in 2014 - with Boeing getting around 60% more money - to develop manned flight to the ISS, the conventional beltway wisdom was that Boeing would be the provider and the brash startup that talked about reusing boosters would fail. You know the rest of that story.
Eric Berger at Ars Technica points out:
Much of the funding increase for SpaceX in 2022, an increase of about $400 million over the previous year, appears to be driven by contracts for the Human Landing System as part of the Artemis Moon Program and the purchase of additional Crew Dragon missions to the space station.
That last part about purchasing additional Crew Dragon missions, which means more Crew Dragon and less Starliner, is a direct transfer of NASA money to SpaceX that would have gone to Boeing if Starliner delivered more bang for the buck.
Success begats success.
ReplyDeleteAnother glaring reason to throw SLS into the scrap heap, and start fining Boeing for nonperformance per contract. It'll never happen, but one can always hope sanity will eventually prevail... that, or total collapse of the Space Program!
ReplyDeleteI hope not.
It's only going to get worse as ULA won't be able to meet DOD launch needs until at least mid to late 2023 with Vulcan, if not 2024 or even later. DOD is already mulling buying more SpaceX for existing ULA launches.
ReplyDeleteAnd that's not factoring in when Starship (Cargo), Starship (Crewed) and Starship (non-Earth Returnable (includes Human Lander and any in-space-only versions) come online for actual payloads.
Seriously, the only thing keeping Boeing and Lockmart in the space business is Congress.
Agreed. And I retired from Lockmart.
DeleteBut I'm told Boeing has um, three vowels in a row? That means good, right?
ReplyDelete