Just because they're small stories doesn't mean they aren't interesting
Europe's Ariane Group completes test of reusable Themis booster
The Ariane Group announced yesterday that they had completed something resembling a WDR - Wet Dress Rehearsal - of their Themis booster. The test itself was actually on July 23rd.
During the test, the 28-meter-tall demonstrator underwent a simulated pre-flight sequence under cryogenic conditions. The test did not use the liquid oxygen and liquid methane that will be used during powered testing. Instead, liquid nitrogen was circulated through the vehicle’s cryogenic tanks and lines.
This may not seem super exciting, but… The wet dress rehearsal represents the most significant publicly announced milestone in the Themis test campaign since September 2025, when the T1H demonstrator was erected on its four landing legs at Esrange, marking the start of combined testing. In January 2026, then-director of ESA’s space transportation program Toni Tolker-Nielsen explained that Kiruna, where Esrange is located, was under snow and that they were “waiting for spring.” It is not yet clear when the next milestone in the test campaign will take place.
I've been covering whatever I could find about Themis since it was announced in March of 2019, so over seven years ago, and it has generally been the story that they will go months or years without releasing a word about it, then something like this comes along.
This image was first posted here in that March 7, 2019 article. And, yes, it sure does look like a Falcon 9 from this angle - although grid fins either aren't there or aren't visible.
A current photo from this test site is on the European Spaceflight page, linked at the top of this section. It's obvious from that photo that this pad isn't a launch pad and couldn't survive engines firing on it for any length of time.
In keeping with their history of "they will go months or years without releasing a word about it, then something like this comes along", there is no mention of what the next testing will be or when to expect it to happen.
The big, surprising, out-of-nowhere story though was:
The DOT is looking to exempt some launches from environmental regulations
The Department of Transportation is proposing to exempt commercial space launch licensing from many environmental regulations, a move praised by industry but (of course) criticized by environmental groups. This week, the DOT said it intends to file a proposed rule for public comment (I assume they're referring to an NPR or Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) that would exempt Federal Aviation Administration licenses for commercial launches and reentries, as well as launch sites, from 13 federal laws and associated regulations. If the NPR is the way they're doing this, it will be open for public comments for a period defined by the laws. You can be sure the greenies will attack this plan.
Environmental concerns raised… Among the laws that would be waived in the proposed rule is the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA, which requires environmental reviews for “major federal actions” that include licenses. “America won the first Space Race, and we can do it again, but only if we get government red tape out of the way,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said about the proposed rule. Environmental groups, though, strongly oppose the proposal, noting it would waive not just NEPA but other environmental laws, including the Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, and Clean Air Act.
If you saw the post before Flight Test 13, it was full of environmentalist complaints about using the Texas Starbase to launch anything. As I've said many times, reading Michael Shellenberger's Apocalypse Never showed me in more detail than anything I've come across how modern environmentalism is basically the result of rich, or "well to do" people who want a pretty place to go on vacation.

And who's funding all these environmentalist groups? Well, funny that, a lot of them lost funding when USAID was shut down. Others are linked to Soros and other 'socialist' billionaires and groups.
ReplyDeleteHopefully the DOT will be able to get away with this.
> reading Michael Shellenberger's Apocalypse Never showed me in more detail than anything I've come across how modern environmentalism is basically the result of rich, or "well to do" people who want a pretty place to go on vacation.
ReplyDelete"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." -- Prince Philip
I think modern environmentalism is a death cult which wants a Jim Jones type result. Suburban soccer moms don't have a Jonestown picture in mind as a goal, but they are cheerleading for policies which produce these anti-human-thriving results. For example, why isn't the environmental movement advocating for nuclear power, which doesn't put CO2 in the air, using newer designs which don't fail in the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, or Fukushima way? Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore claims environmentalism has fallen into a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purity_spiral
All of these policies have enough performance data now to know they hurt human thriving, yet they continue to be promoted. This isn't an accident, they are all working for the goals of the death cult. Isn't it interesting that Al Gore and Ted Kaczynski promote the same policies?:
ReplyDeleteImperial war; gun banning; widening surveillance; central planning; centralized research funding; uniform schooling; government deficit spending; currency inflation to prevent saving for retirement; welfare for people who didn't pay in; prosecute the middle class for saying mean words while letting violent attackers go free; quotas to hire and promote on demographics rather than performance; advice from the medical establishment, including fat/cholesterol/heart disease, sugar/starch/weight/diabetes, MRNA therapy.