Frequent visitor and fellow electrical engineer-geek, LeverAction, posts on something I saw the other day that made shivers run down my spine. In "Just How Bad Is It?" he points out:
Our national debt has risen by $2,000,000,000,000 to the level of $13,473,000,000,000.The last figures I have for US GDP are from 2009, $14.1 Trillion. I don't know what this year's figures are, but using the 2009 GDP (which will be close) and 2010 debt, that's a debt ratio of 95.5% of GDP. It probably goes without saying that I'm skeptical of government numbers for growth in the economy and most generally reported statistics. There's ample evidence that the Fed.gov leviathan changes the way they report such things all the time, in whatever way makes those in power look good. John Williams at Shadowstats has made a nice little career of keeping track of these
How bad is 95.5% of GDP? It makes us one of the worst in the world. It's difficult for me to tell you exactly where we rank compared to other nations because the latest statistics I can find seem to be from various different years. This graph (from here) is closest, and it's from 2009.
Conclusion? The US is in really bad shape. No surprise. What really concerns me is that I'm not familiar with any country with debt to GDP ratios like ours ever becoming prosperous again. They all fade to gray. Or worse. Or even worse. What do you think?
Gerald Celente reckons that the US is going to become the world's first "UN-developed" nation ... in the next year or two. Merry Christmas!ReplyDelete
No, there's not a chance of fiscal recovery for you or Europe. Hard on the heels of the debt crises is the looming impact of peak oil; as far as I'm aware, economic growth is inversely proportional to the price of oil.
BTW, you might like to know that, over the Christmas period, our myriad wind turbines (UK) have produced as much as 1.6% of our electrical energy ... and as little as O%. Sometimes, they actually consume energy as they require internal heating in cold, still, weather. They also are driven, in still weather, to prevent damage to the bearings. Or something.
It's all most depressing.
Gerald Celente is worth listening to.ReplyDelete
I would generalize what you said about economic growth being inversely proportional to the price of oil to say inversely proportional to the price of energy. If we had another source of energy that was comparable to oil in performance and price, there'd be no problem.
If the greens would get their collective heads out of their butts and allow us to develop widespread nuclear power, we'd be in much better shape. In the meantime, I understand we have enough natural gas here in the US to run the planet until 2100 at high growth rates. But they won't allow us to do that, either. The same folks who pushed through your wind turbines that actually deplete energy.
What's with it with these people? They keep chasing the most impractical, lowest energy-density, worst possible sources of energy and refuse the sources that have a good chance of working.