Today, J.KB at Gun Free Zone posted an article on Genghis Khan talking about how Genghis Kahn is being talked about as so good for the environment. Why? Because he killed off 40 million people and "scrubbed 700m tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere – roughly the quantity of carbon dioxide generated in a year through global petrol consumption – by allowing previously populated and cultivated land to return to carbon-absorbing forest." Khan killed a lot of people; 40 million was a substantial percentage of the population then, but he's still a piker compared to Chairman Mao who killed off at least twice that number.
Then Borepatch ran a post about that with some links to older posts he did talking about the same concepts.
Which led me back to one of my older posts that I've found myself looking up a few times a year (more, lately). This is from June of 2011. With 11 years of content,
it's pretty amazing how often I go back to something I researched and
posted years ago. This one of the posts I've looked up the most. (The first short line with two links adds surprisingly little to the story, although the second adds more than the first.)
Let's Tie A Couple of Stories Together - part ii
Let me tie Wednesday and Saturday together.
As I said Wednesday's post, it's all about UN Agenda 21, and allowing the flooding of wide tracts of the US supports that idea. Trevor Loudon at New Zeal has a great post to help you get up to speed on the UN's Agenda 21. The implications of this plan make Soylent Green or any of the worst, most dystopian-future movies look like Mary Poppins (the most relentlessly optimistic, happy movie I can think of). To begin with, let's look at a map. Trevor has a small version, so I went and found one that's readable if you click on it:
If this UN plan goes into effect, every area in red will be "forbidden zone" for humans. Every area in yellow will be "highly regulated". I assume that means you will only be allowed there with permits and strict time limits - not to live there. Humans will basically be allowed to live only in densely packed urban areas, shown as black dots. Think all of the worst places in America: Chicago, Detroit, New York, Boston, DC... you get the idea.
Central to the plan is the idea of being carbon neutral. That's right, "global warming" or "climate change" or whatever they call it this week, is the basis for mass murder on a scale that Mao, Pol Pot, or Hitler could never aspire to. You see, to quote from this piece at End of The American Dream, (source missing, 4/14/21) the population must be reduced:
Gee, the moderate guy only wants to kill off more than 95% of the human race. See the current world population is around 7 billion people. For Dave Foreman, 100 million out of 7 billion is 100 out of 7000 or 1.4 %. At 300 million, Ted Turner would generously let 4.3% live.
- CNN Founder Ted Turner: "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
- Dave Foreman, Earth First Co-Founder: "My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world."
- Maurice Strong: "Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?"
Around 20 years ago, I heard that the entire population of the world would fit in Jacksonville, Florida, without resorting to vertical high rise buildings. It would be austere, but they would fit. I found the area of the city (885 square miles), ran the calculation, and it worked. Even today, you still could fit every man woman and child in the world in the area of Jacksonville, but each person would only get 3.5 square feet, so it would pretty much be shoulder to shoulder. According to the Wiki, the area of the state of Florida is 65,755 square miles. Given the 7 billion people in the world, if you spread them evenly across the state, every person in the world would get 261.9 square feet. Not a big room (unless you're in NYC), and small by US standards, but generous compared to much of the world. Of course, the infrastructure would take room, so you'd probably need to spread them out, but I suspect everyone in the world would fit comfortably in the southeastern US. And we need to kill off 95% of them because they're taking up too many resources?
John P. Holdren, Barack Obama's top science advisor, co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" back in 1977 in which he actually advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, a one world government and a global police force to enforce population control.source for that and this:
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
So the Fed.gov, acting under the Agenda 21 of the UN, wants to forcibly - at gunpoint, I assume - abort your babies, put sterilants in the drinking water, move you to a city center where you can be stacked up like cord wood, and "live" where every move you make, every thing you eat, every decision you make, is made for you by the state. If you're one of the few percent who aren't killed off. All in the name of the skankiest, most corrupt "science" humans have ever put on paper (pretty good summary). It's pretty damned obvious why they don't want us armed, isn't it?
Oh - if the idea of fitting the entire population of the world into Florida is shocking, you may want to look at this 2013 post.
No matter how evil, nasty and horrible you may believe leftists are the ugly reality is they are MORE evil, MORE nasty and MORE horrible than the vastReplyDelete
majority of us can imagine. Exterminating BILLIONS of people doesn't even
cause them to blink. And like ALL evil in the world they must be ACTIVELY and
often VIOLENTLY opposed.....anything less allows them access to power. And power in their hands is the worst thing that can happen.
These freaking people are insane.ReplyDelete
Stick them all in small 4X8 rubber rooms and see what they have to say after about ten years of it.
and why is Bill Gates buying up all that farmland (all lowland that can be easily flooded)ReplyDelete
There are a couple of explanations.Delete
The more generic is that people like Gates have so much money they don't handle the money themselves; they hire investment companies to do that for them. The investment companies buy farm land for the same reason they buy anything else: it's considered a better or safer or higher return investment than anything else given the market conditions.
A reason more in line with the Agenda 21/2030 theme is that they're getting it out of use so that it's better for the environment. One of the links in the piece (this one) is about the Army Corps of Engineers buying up farmland along the Missouri flood plain so that they can return it to a wild state (like you referring to Gates buying up easily flooded land). Assuming we don't need the space to feed our population plus all the other places in the world we feed.
Then there's the thought that he can buy up enough farmland to make it all fallow and starve lots of people to death.
Take your pick.
He's buying it for the same reason he buys anything: because he CAN.ReplyDelete
In 70-80 years, he's still just as dead, and it's not his decision any more.
The CoE buying up Missouri river bottomland is to stop jackholes from building farmhouses on it, and then filing for flood recompense when it (predictably) floods out every 25, 50,or 100 years.
It's the same reason people who build along the beach or in wildfire-prone mountains should get $0 in fire and hurricane payouts, for anything less than a 100% premium, per annum, and only after a proctological permitting process that makes them sign away a kidney and acknowledging to God and everybody they know they're getting nothing when Nature kicks their ass and destroys their home.
The CoE can lease the land back to people, just without permitting structures or farm vehicles to occupy it for longer than daily use, and declaring it ineligible for any sort of insurance or disaster relief payout.
I've watched five generations of idiots build shake-roof houses in hills around here, or on the bach, and then piss and moan every time Nature wipes out their sand castle, then line up like good little progtard millionaires looking for Uncle Sugar's gold-plated Stupidity Bailout time after ridiculous time.
What they should get is a good horsewhipping, followed by mandatory institutionalization for mental illness. Once or twice in a lifetime would probably cure the disease forever for 99.999% of all cases.
I had blissfully forgotten that map. People who want to control, keep building maps. And they keep building unpleasant places to keep people.ReplyDelete
What does the Georgia Guide Stones say? Sociopaths' NEED to "Warn" their Victims or it's not fun to them.ReplyDelete
When you NEED POWER over other people you always NEED MOAR like crack addicts need MOAR and different drug mixtures every single day.
Chew the fingers off the giant and he is helpless with all his "great mind and strength". Chewing on EACH other only gives Pleasure to the Giant.