Any cord cutters visitors here? In the sense of ditching cable TV and moving to over the air and streaming services? I'd be interested in your feedback if you see I'm getting ready to do something wrong.
I'm in the process of joining the "movement". I've gotta say, though, that there's far much more to learn to do this than I would have thought before I started. Especially for a career radio frequency circuit designer, who got started in high-end satellite TV receivers for cable TV companies. This was long before the birth of DirectTV and small aperture satellite receivers at home. It was also well before the Digital TV "revolution". TV is different and there's a ton of small details to learn and understand.
Let me back up for a second. We've been cable TV subscribers since around the time we moved here into central Florida in '82. There was broadcast (OTA) TV available, but a few networks and all of the transmitters were far enough away that we were considered fringe or beyond fringe for reception: not very good quality without a fairly serious outside antenna. To get a good picture, and then for the larger variety of choices, we started cable. Our provider was bought up a series of times and in the course of the last six months has gone up twice. It has finally gotten to the point where we just think it's far too much for the little we watch.
So the process should be simple enough. First and foremost, we need an outside antenna. In the intervening 36 years we've been here, the transmitters haven't gotten closer, so we still need something better than a window antenna - not to mention we don't have a window pointing at the transmitters. A popular website called TV Fool will help you find what signals you should be able to get and the distances to the transmitters. Another site that does the same basic service is Antennaweb. The HDTV industry has adopted color codes to help you choose the antennas you need and they classify them into ranges by mileage they should work over. We chose an antenna. We'll mount it on the west side of the house, about 15' up and manually point it at the transmitters to the northwest.
We want to keep the cable company as our ISP - we have nothing against their service, it's just the cost for the few things we watch that's bothering me. That means we have a cable coming to a junction box on the side of the house; we have underground utilities so it runs the roughly 40 feet from the corner of the lot to where it comes out of the ground. That cable goes into the attic where it goes through a little signal splitter which sends one branch to the TV and the other (marked "Tap") here to the modem for the internet connection.
The point of mentioning this is that we have all the cabling we need already in place, so I don't see a need to go up into the crawlspace. I just need to couple the antenna signals onto the coax to the attic, and that calls for a signal splitter/combiner. This is a very common component in the radio/microwave world I come from; so common that there's a small industry providing components like that optimized for particular applications. It turns out yet another part of the industry provides combiners and splitters for the TV industry and the TV world is different from the rest of the industry.
A different concern for TV splitter/combiners is that some of them need to pass DC voltage to power a low noise amplifier at the antenna. This introduces complications. Do you need the DC on both legs of the splitter/both inputs of the combiner or just one leg? Does the voltage go through either way you configure the splitter/combiner or just one way? The first one I got, at Lowe's, had markings I misinterpreted, and only routed power from the dual connector side to the single connector side, while I need it to go the other way. I picked another combiner.
Given all that, this is what my hookup diagram looks like:
The DC Blocks are "just in case I need them", to keep the power going to the LNA from going back into the cable company's circuitry and to keep it from going into our cable modem. I don't know that there's DC on those lines to block, but I think there will be. Everything I've had to buy says "new"; the rest is existing infrastructure. I consider myself both too old and too fat to crawl around in the crawlspace running new cables, and that's not even including the possibility of falling through the ceiling (happened to a friend once while not even fully in the attic; it was an awful spinal injury that was very hard to recover from). With this approach, I won't need to go up there.
If you've done this sort of conversion, any input would be appreciated.
I've just cut the cable TV cord in the last couple months, and here is what I did. I kept the cable internet connection, wired to my household computer and a wireless router that connects to, among other things, two Kindles, two Iphones, two Echo Dots, an Ipad, a laptop, an LG smart 4K HDTV, and and Amazon Firestick hooked to an HDMI port on the TV.ReplyDelete
The smart TV has native support for Netflix, Amazon Prime, Pandora and a bunch of other stuff I don't use.
The reason for the Amazon Firestick was support for PlayStation Vue, which costs around $40 per month and brings in most of the cable networks I watch. Fox News, Nat Geo, Animal Planet, Discovery, etc. It also supports all the other subscription services the TV does and then some.
Local channels come in via this antenna hooked to the coax antenna port on the TV :
That's all. Nothing else required for us.
Thanks, but I guess not having to run an outside antenna into the TV makes that an easier setup.Delete
For me, I'd have to run a new cable from the outside antenna through the attic to the room with the TV. Then I could leave the data cable to the computers and have a TV antenna straight to the TV.
I'd be very concerned about cable leakage getting back through the combiner and LNA, and getting to the antenna.ReplyDelete
If you accidentally start airing cable TV over-the-air.......well....you know.
What are the specs on the combiner and LNA?
Specifications? Bwah ha ha ha ha ha ... whew - sorry. One of things that annoys me is how I can't get meaningful specs or schematics or anything. I can't even verify that the combiner is really a hybrid; given the 5-1000 MHz BW, probably a lumped element design (transformer). Should be - they claim 3.5 dB insertion loss and you don't get that with resistors.Delete
Rule Of Thumb Engineering (ROTE) says I can expect about 25 dB isolation between the cable internet and the antenna ports on the combiner. ROTE also says the reverse isolation on an amplifier is forward gain plus about 3-6 dB (unless it was specifically designed for good reverse isolation). The box says the LNA is 16 dB gain, so lets say 20 dB reverse isolation; add that to the 25 across the combiner and it knocks the cable leakage down 45 dB.
Is it sufficient to knock the cable down by 45 dB? Don't know. What levels are on the cable? Don't know. Can I get the cable company to cut the signal off entirely? Don't know.
I finally found a datasheet for the "inside the attic" splitter (on the right in the diagram). It's not a splitter, it's -6 dB directional coupler, but more importantly, doesn't conduct DC in any direction. So the diagram is dead at this point.Delete
IIRC, those are also called "taps". I used to do a lot of CCTV, and some of the equipment is pretty good, but a lot of it is junk.Delete
This is where you look for a SMART young buck to do the crawling instead of your fat self! I'm not fat, but shaky enough on a ladder. Hey boy, up you go, I'll be the ladder spotter.ReplyDelete
I'm not a cord cutter, but I do have ROKU. I've had one since early 2012 and it works great. We stream Netflix, Amazon (included with Prime membership) and Hulu.ReplyDelete
We cut the cord 4 years ago, when we moved far enough out into the country that cable or dsl weren't options, and the bandwidth limitations of satellite made it a no-go. We get our internet through an unlimited data cellphone plan. We have a Roku, amazon prime, YouTube and Netflix. Between those, we have more than enough crappy things to watch when bored. My point is that the antenna an wiring aren't worth the trouble, unless you can't live without local news.ReplyDelete
Our current setup is cable to DVR/converter box to HDMI 1 and a Roku stick on HDMI 2. The Roku is going to stay. We're Amazon Prime members but never watched a second of their video offerings. I think I'll look at and see what's there.ReplyDelete
Aside from that, nothing is decided. I kind of like the Sling TV offerings, but it's $25 or so a month and carries with it the "I'm not watching most of these channels, so why am I paying for it?" that the cable has.
Let's say that the $20 plan had 20 channels. Would they make less money charging $1.00 per channel for the ones we truly want? I'd sign up in a heartbeat if I could rattle off a list of channels I'd be more likely to watch for a buck a piece per month, but maybe my bill would $18 a month instead of $20.
They call themselves a la carte TV - that would truly be a la carte.
You are right about Sling TV in that most channels it provides I don't watch. It would be nice to get Science and American hero channels but $25 is better than $70 I was paying. One thing though with the Sling TV Recorder is that I don't waste time channel surfing but record the shows I like(you can choose one time or all or only new shows) and watch what I want when I'm ready. ...Djone.ReplyDelete
Have you looked in to the "Free To Air" satellite programs.ReplyDelete
There's an astounding amount of good programming, and a $200 receiver and a 1M offset fed dish are all you need.
I'd look in to it, but if I put up another antenna, my wife would make me sleep in the basement.....
It might be worthwhile to see if the unused cables run in the vicinity of your new antenna or TV. If it's RG6 and still good, might be an alternate path...ReplyDelete