I did my holiday travel by SUV, and according to Oak Ridge National Laboratory (motto: “we're from Tennessee so we're not all Nuckin' Futs.”) and posted on Political Calculations blog, the least fuel efficient way to travel is by light truck; the category which includes SUVs.
On this chart, produced by Political Calculations from the data linked here, lower is better.
The chart shows BTUSs per passenger mile for the 40 years from 1976 to 2016. As you can see, light trucks are at the top - the worst fuel economy.
In the chart, "Light Truck" refers to any two-axle, four wheel truck, which would include anything from pickup trucks to SUVs. "Air" refers to commercial air travel, while "Intercity Rail" in the U.S. means train travel via Amtrak.It should be mentioned that each category is an average of everything they measured in that vehicle class. Air travel has improved, as noted, but SUVs have improved by a bigger percentage. Most of that was by 1991. It's a safe bet that today's jets going into service have better fuel economy compared to 1976 jets still in service, just as today's SUVs will when compared to any 40 year old SUVs on the road. Mine's an '09, which is right where the line jumped up (got worse) for the second to last time.
Probably the most remarkable thing is how air travel has become less energy intensive per passenger mile than both transit buses (after 1996) and cars (after 2004). The second most remarkable thing we find is how transit buses have become worse over time.
Snippi gonna hate me. Not that I care.
(Note, that Oak Ridge file has an odd name and no extension, but if you look at it, you'll see it's a CSV file - Comma Separated Variables - that any spreadsheet program will read. Just re-name it with a .csv extension and you'll be good. I'm using one of the free spreadsheets, Libre Office, and it imported the file with no problems.)
Besides, she's a time traveler and just passing through. You've seen the picture, right? Several excellent pictures at that article.
Edit 2050 EST: Forgot to add one of the links I should have linked.
Whatever you do, don't tell her where John Connor is.ReplyDelete
Buses still use diesel, and that's gotten much more expensive.ReplyDelete
Snippi isn't a time traveller, she just lives in a region where way too many stupid people breed, and there's only so many pairs of DNA to swap around.ReplyDelete
She does, however, have most of the external markers for a Fetal Alcohol Syndrome child, which explains her mid-70s IQ rather handily.
I got a laugh out of several newspaper articles taking the time to refute that she's a time traveler. Does anyone seriously think time traveling is real?Delete
FAS goes hand in hand with Snippi's parents being the ones responsible for her climate change antics. A couple of stoners having an autistic child and encouraging her to be the global PITA that she is just makes sense to me.
Of course she's not a time traveler except in the way we all are. She's obviously some form of what the Celts called Fae, perhaps álfar or a wight. Maybe half-breed troll. ;^)Delete
HOW DARE YOU?!?!ReplyDelete
(on the plus side, she's good for a resurgence of the interrobang)
A huge and unmentioned variable is how many passengers per car or SUV.ReplyDelete
You can cut in half the energy per passenger-mile by doubling the number of passengers.
The Oak Ridge data is supposed to take that into account. It says "BTUs per passenger mile." Don't ask me how they got that data, but it's possible.Delete
To shut down Greta Thunburg all you need to do is give her a wind up Hitachi magic wand.ReplyDelete
I saw the time traveler Greta evidence and was going to post it, but you beat, in time!ReplyDelete
Or - much more likely - evidence that a genetically similar population will produce phenotypes that are virtually identical, even hundreds of years apart.ReplyDelete