I came to think of Standard Motor Products as an enormous machine that regularly scans every tiny part of every engine in every car on the streets of the United States to answer two closely related questions: What makes sense to manufacture here in the U.S., and what should be made in a low-wage country, like Mexico or China?I've worked in electronics manufacturing for virtually my entire adult life; first as an electronics technician, and eventually as an engineer. If there's one constant, it's the refinement of processes to run more automatically and require fewer but higher-level people. (I suppose the other constant since 1975 has been people telling me we don't manufacture anything in America anymore). I see the same trend in the Atlantic piece.
If an engineer from 1975 had been put in suspended animation and brought back today, they could look in today's typical electronics box, like an iPod, or other toy, and not recognize a thing. There are some parts that haven't changed much, because the physics that rules them is so unforgiving that no better ways have been found, but it wouldn't be obvious for most uses. The size of components has shrunk dramatically and inexorably, such that most of them no longer have lead wires attached to them, but rather are tiny pieces that appear to be ceramic flakes (a part smaller than a red pepper seed, .040" long by .020" wide, is not considered small today). These tiny ceramic chips have metal plated onto their ends which are soldered to a circuit board. The only practical way to handle and solder parts like this in volume is with machinery, removing many of the semi-skilled workers in the work flow.
The National Association of Manufacturers says the US is the largest manufacturing sector in the world, with China number 2 and Japan at 3. Even if you swap the US and China, the manufacturing sector still produces a lot in this country. Kevin at The Smallest Minority ran a piece on Sunday about the manufacturing of iPhones. It focused on a New York Times piece that basically said the iPhone is made in China because it couldn't be made anywhere else; every part is made in a city less than 25 miles across. It feeds the illusion that it couldn't be made here because no such places exist in the US. I call bull crap on that. Too much is made of the wage differences between here and China or India and not enough is made about our advantages in high-tech. In the Atlantic piece the Standard managers are saying they won't go to China unless they save about 40% in the cost of the part, to cover the indirect costs, I'm sure.
I would argue the US' biggest problems are not our wage structures, but our regulatory and tax structures (link is to a pdf). As always, government is the problem. Our corporate tax rates are punitive - either the worst or second worst in the world (everybody, all together, corporations don't pay tax, they raise their price to collect the tax - or they get out of the country). Our regulatory processes have been made up as make work programs for lawyers and they look it. Still, while we may not manufacture ten million of this years' hot computer toy, we produce billions of dollars worth of industrial and other products. The NAM says that taken by itself, US manufacturing would be the 9th largest economy in the world.
I vaguely remember a Joe Biden quote that struck me with such force, it almost knocked me over. If Joe gets it through that titanium skull of his, anyone should get it. Over a decade ago, I believe, he said, "we have to be careful that if we really want to create jobs, we can't be too anti-business in our message".
You are perfectly correct that it is taxation and regulation that drive our business offshore. But, if I read that same article correctly, China's drive to succeed, as well as the removal of the stumbling blocks we find in cooperation between businesses in this country, are also responsible for China acquiring more and more of our market share in production.
China had already opened a factory wing to produce glass that it knew would be usable for the new breed of cell phones and other devices. They provided the needed engineers to work with the customer (Apple in this instance) to meet the customer's needs. These are significant, especially when time is an issue.
It certainly helped that they didn't have to spend the time and money doing bullshit EPA studies and applications in order to open the wing and produce the glass samples they had ready to be tested, but they are also driven to meet the needs of the marketplace in a way that would have been impossible to believe twenty years ago.
This simply cannot be done at this time in this country. And as much as many of us would like to "Buy American", often it simply isn't possible to find an item made in America. When it is - like cars and Harleys - the workforce is lazy, greedy, and unionized (but I repeat myself). So you often get substandard assembly of substandard parts. We call them "lemons" when they are poorly made and assembled, but often their designs are flawed as well.
Yes, China gets a leg up because their labor costs for assembly are much lower than ours, but again part of that is because our workers force the manufacturers to charge too much, due to high wages, cost of medical coverage, pensions, etc., but also because of a rotten work ethic. Have you read BillyBob's rant at Hell On Earth? (http://hellonearth-1.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-ever-happened-to-work-ethic.html)
We have good people in this country innovating great products produced (sometimes) by skilled workers with a good work ethic. But often the marketplace is severely damaged by the regulations and taxation that you speak of, preventing anything close to a level playing field with China. And the innovation that use to be commonplace here is being strangled by those same factors, along with the refusal of many to capitalize such innovation in this economy.
You raise several good points. The responsiveness of the Chinese factories in having the glass available seems to me to be an example of them being backstopped by the government, so it's not a big risk if they don't find a quick market for that glass. Like our too big to fail bailout recipients. The NYT article also said Corning had invented Gorilla glass some time ago, and ceased production - presumably because they knew it was a low tech commodity they could be under priced on too easily.ReplyDelete
I looked for, but couldn't immediately find while writing this, a story I heard that as a percent of GDP, American manufacturing is as big as it was in the 1950s, which the Atlantic article cited as the Golden Age. The other side of that stat is the percentage of people working in it has gone down a lot, as a result of those productivity improvements.
Certainly the attitude BillyBob talked about is out there. Our factory seems pretty diligent at getting rid of them.
Don't forget unions as an unnecessary but expensive piece of overhead as well.ReplyDelete
Unions can usually be worked around; it's why so much business is relocating to the "right to work" states (I live in one). It's why the new car factories in the US are mostly being built in the south. That said, there's the example of what the Obama-noids did to Boeing after they invested a billion (?) in a plant in South Carolina to augment (not replace) their Washington plants and build more aircraft.ReplyDelete