The SN8 Test Flight Was Worth Waiting For

The long awaited and frequently talked about test flight of Starship Prototype Serial Number 8 took place at 4:45 PM CST, after a countdown that went into a long hold at T-2:06 earlier in the day.  They analyzed their data and decided to launch anyway.  

With no feedback from SpaceX, the flight had a lot of events that seemed like problems but could have been planned.  Elon Musk's tweets in the aftermath of the flight make them appear to be planned.  One Raptor engine shut down at 1 minute 45 into flight & the second at 3:15 into flight. One talking head/commenter speculated that this was done deliberately to lower the thrust to weight ratio and keep the vehicle from accelerating too quickly.  It could also be used to judge how well the control systems adapted to loss of two engines. Yes, the vehicle slammed down during the attempt to flip upright and land on its legs.  Elon always said the chance of getting everything right was about 1 in 3.

That's the wreckage of SN8 after its RUD (Rapid Unplanned Disassembly).  In the hour or so after the test, Elon tweeted (oldest to most recent from top to bottom):

Successful ascent, switchover to header tanks & precise flap control to landing point!

Fuel header tank pressure was low during landing burn, causing touchdown velocity to be high & RUD, but we got all the data we needed! Congrats SpaceX team hell yeah!!

SN8 did great! Even reaching apogee would’ve been great, so controlling all way to putting the crater in the right spot was epic!!

From Elon Musk's Twitter account.

On the left edge of that screen capture image, you can see some dark smoke wafting away from the wreckage.  It was still burning an hour and a half later at 7:15 PM EST when I sat down to compose this, but has seemingly burned out now, another half hour later. 

Meanwhile I'll leave you with this: the entire test flight.  Don't rewind this to the beginning. It starts at T-1:00 minute or 1:47:11 into the entire video. 

I bet that SN9 will go to the test pad No Later Than Friday, and will progress through its tests faster than SN8. 

A Hectic Day Leads to a Mixed Up Post

Hectic?  In what way?  You ask.  Some of it was sitting and watching activities on the attempt to launch Starship SN8 that was aborted automatically as the engines were coming up to thrust.  Some of it was centered on one of those phrases I'm sure all of us have heard but not all have had problems with:  Medicare Open Enrollment.  It's that time of year when you can change other plans you have, dropping or adding as you wish.  Some of it was Christmas decorating and keeping on top of things in the house.. 

There has been no official description of what the problem at engine startup was, but since it was 4:35 PM with the window officially closing at 5:00, they stood down for the day quickly.  There's a repeat of the TFR and road closure tomorrow as well, so depending on what they find was the problem, this could launch tomorrow.  Or not.  These engines have been static fired, so we know they started at least once! 

A surprise today was that NASA flew one of their WB-57 aircraft down to around the launch site, a reconnaissance jet often used to capture aerial photos and videos of spacecraft tests.  No one had mentioned that possibility in any of my reading leading up to today.  Chances are this is a part of the $135 million Starship Moon lander contract awarded by NASA in April.  NASA has positioned itself to benefit from SpaceX’s success and leverage the company’s extensive internal investments.  A few hours of flight like this is probably not a big expense.

A WB-57 - NASA Photo.  In some views, it's reminiscent of a U-2; in others, not so much.

The Medicare Open Enrollment story is more annoying than anything.  The company I retired from, doesn't exist anymore.  Two or three years ago, they were bought by a bigger fish in the sea, and last year merged with another to create an even bigger fish.  Rather than going to the HR department, I have to go to a company they contract with to manage the relationships between retirees and the various insurance companies.  Something I did in early November triggered them to assign someone to call me this evening at 7:15 local.  Meanwhile something else triggered them to cancel the call - without letting me know.   No phone call as I sat here waiting.  I suppose there's a chance they'll call me at 7:15 in someone else's time zone.  Bangalore? 

I haven't posted this picture or done much to follow up to it, but that's part of the general busy-ness of the season, too. 

Those are the right points (reference), and have been on the engine eight days.  "All I gotta do" is get the details of assembly right to time the ignition, valves and such, wire up my electronic ignition, put some fuel in the tank and try to start it.   Yeah.  All I gotta do.

For Those Attempting to Watch The Starship Test Flight Tuesday 12/8

While we don't have a released time for the launch, the road closure and Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) run from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM CST and SpaceX has announced they'll be starting a webcast or stream video "a few minutes before the test."  You can watch on YouTube or on the SpaceX Starship site and get more details about the mission and their coverage.  If they don't make it tomorrow, there are backup opportunities the next two days.

Earlier today, they ran a wet dress rehearsal, similar to what they do on a Falcon 9 a day or two before lift off. Tanks are filled with liquid methane and oxygen, pumps turned on, engines pre-chilled, pre-burners tested; in other words, everything short of firing the engines.  Then the vehicle was de-tanked and made safe.  Ready for the big step. 

Screen capture while replaying the test; the time along the bottom is the recorded time at this point in the test, when the vehicle is venting gases from multiple places.

This is a test of a complex piece of hardware. They've built up to this point slowly and methodically, failing and improving all along the way.  Last Friday (as best I recall) SN8 was fitted with explosive charges to destroy the vehicle in flight should it get too far off course.  SpaceX has a pretty good few paragraphs on the webpage with their video link.

As early as Tuesday, December 8, the SpaceX team will make the first attempt of a high-altitude suborbital flight test of Starship serial number 8 (SN8) from our site in Cameron County, Texas. The schedule is dynamic and likely to change, as is the case with all development testing.

This suborbital flight is designed to test a number of objectives, from how the vehicle’s three Raptor engines perform to the overall aerodynamic entry capabilities of the vehicle (including its body flaps) to how the vehicle manages propellant transition. SN8 will also attempt to perform a landing flip maneuver, which would be a first for a vehicle of this size.

With a test such as this, success is not measured by completion of specific objectives but rather how much we can learn, which will inform and improve the probability of success in the future as SpaceX rapidly advances development of Starship.

They go on to say that between serial numbers SN5 and SN6, their hops and other tests, they've accumulated over 16,000 seconds - almost 4-1/2 hours - of run time during 330 ground engine starts, including multiple Starship static fires and four flight tests of the reusable methalox full-flow staged combustion Raptor engine. Additionally, with production accelerating and fidelity increasing, SpaceX has built 10 Starship prototypes.  Numbers 9 through 16 are in various stages of assembly there at Boca Chica.  The first Superheavy booster is being built up there as well.

Elon Musk flew into Brownsville yesterday, and tweeted he was out on the pad this afternoon.  That automatically makes the big test look closer.  As a comment by reader Homesteader said on Friday, this feels like being on the dunes at Kitty Hawk when the Wright Brothers came. 

100th Falcon 9 Launch Sends NextGen Dragon Cargo Capsule to ISS

Today's CRS-21 mission marked a historic day for SpaceX, with the launch of the next generation Cargo Dragon 2 capsule to the International Space Station.  The launch was the 100th launch of a Falcon 9, and the fourth flight of booster B1058.  The successful landing of that booster on the drone ship was the 68th successful recovery of a booster and the 35th successful recovery on drone ship Of Course I Still Love You.  It was the 24th launch for SpaceX this year, with three more for December on the manifest at Spaceflight Now.

In a slew of firsts for NASA and SpaceX, CRS-21 marked the first time in history a new spacecraft has debuted on a flight-proven rocket, the first time SpaceX has flown an orbital mission for NASA on a twice or thrice-flown Falcon 9 booster, and the first time SpaceX has flown an orbital mission for NASA on a booster with non-NASA flights in its history.

Even further, still, SpaceX managed to turn Falcon 9 booster B1058 around for CRS-21 – satisfying NASA’s strict standards – in just 61 days, making it the third fastest Falcon booster turnaround ever. In other words, SpaceX’s successful CRS-21 launch has simultaneously demonstrated that a booster good enough for Starlink is good enough for NASA and that even rapid Falcon refurbishment is up to NASA’s standards. With an average turnaround of ~60 days, a single Falcon 9 booster could feasibly support five annual Dragon launches.

The Cargo Dragon 2 craft is a big improvement over the first version that was the first mission SpaceX undertook for NASA.  Ars Technica reports:

Compared to the first SpaceX cargo vehicle, Cargo Dragon 2 features a dozen powered lockers for science experiments, twice as many as previously flown. It is also designed to be recovered and readied for repeat flights more quickly than its predecessor, and the vehicle has the capability to autonomously dock with the station, rather than needing to be grabbed by a robotic arm and attached to a port.

Cargo Dragon 2 is a modified version of the Crew Dragon used for manned launches; the cargo version lacks every system dedicated to human flight.  There are no seats, no cockpit controls, and no life support system.  The vehicle doesn't have the abort system that's required as an emergency escape system if a problem occurs during launch. 

SpaceX points out that when the Cargo Dragon autonomously docks with the ISS, currently set for tomorrow at 1:30 PM EST, there will be two Dragon spacecraft docked at the ISS (the Crew Dragon capsule named Resilience by the crew of four is currently docked there) and that there will very likely be at least one Dragon docked at the ISS from now on.  This calls for a larger number of launches than they have been doing for NASA this year.

Following on the heels of Crew Dragon’s second astronaut flight and operational launch debut, Crew-1 and Cargo Dragon’s CRS-21 resupply run also represent the quickest back-to-back Dragon launches in SpaceX’s history by several months. According to SpaceX comments and NASA schedules, the company’s 2021 manifest will be at least as packed with Dragon launches as 2020, packing another five (and maybe even six) orbital missions into a single year.

To achieve that ambitious manifest (potentially as many Dragon missions as ULA launches in all of 2020, for example), SpaceX and NASA will have to rely more heavily than ever on reusability. Thankfully, CRS-21 has already expanded the envelope of NASA-approved Falcon 9 booster reuse.

The CRS-21 mission lifts off Sunday Morning - SpaceX Photo

Student Debt Cancellation - Is This The Worst Policy Idea in History?

Since the first rumblings of the potential Biden administration, the idea of "forgiving" student loans has gotten talked about a lot; whether from Elizabeth Warren or AOC, we keep hearing "progressives" clamoring for the handout.  Clearly the loans can't be forgiven; money is owed to some bank, (which is to say some one) and the Feds can't wave their hands and make the banks take that loss, so that will mean taking money from some taxpayers to pay other taxpayers.  It takes a study from someone relatively neutral to show just how fair that is. 

The top 20% of income earners will get $192 billion in tax money; the bottom 20% will get $29 billion.  The richest income earners will get over 6-1/2 times the money as the bottom 20%.  Since the lowest quintile of income earners pays almost no tax and gets more in benefits than they pay, they are essentially getting a bigger tax break.  The middle class and higher will pay for this program.  Our tax system is highly progressive, meaning the more one earns the more tax they pay.  The last numbers I can find having blogged about (using 2016 data) is that:

• The top 1 percent paid a greater share of individual income taxes (39.5 percent) than the bottom 90 percent combined (29.1 percent).
• The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid a 27.1 percent individual income tax rate, which is more than seven times higher than taxpayers in the bottom 50 percent (3.5 percent).

This idea is a highly regressive tax policy in that the richer they are, the more tax payout they get.  The reason for the massive "payout to the rich" is pretty simple.  The concept of student debt is deceptive; it implies that the amount of debt is somehow evenly distributed.  That's beyond wrong, it's insanely simple-minded.  The average student debt for an associates degree holder from a state community college is tiny, the average debt for a state college bachelor's degree is a fraction of that from a private college, while the biggest piles of debt of all are held by graduate and professional degree holders.  While some graduate degrees don't gather enormous paychecks, Medical Doctors, Osteopaths, Lawyers and plenty of others gather pretty good pay.  If they didn't get that advanced degree, it's likely they wouldn't be in the top quintile.  Dollar wise, cancelling student debt is primarily going toward cancelling the debt in highest income quintile.

This study was from the University of Chicago (pdf) so not a conservative bastion, and studies from other dedicated liberal groups, like the Urban Institute, reach the same conclusion.

Lots of things about this idea have bothered me from the start.  The first problem I have is how unfair it is to so many people.  Think of the people who paid off their loans.  They took out a loan to pay for their college, paid it back, and now they're going to pay off the loans of people who didn't pay theirs off.  Or parents who paid for the kids' college with bank loans and will pay off other people's loans.  What about the people who thought the return on investment for a four year degree wasn't worth the expense and then went to a trade school.  Let's say they're welders making close to six figures.  Now they'll have the privilege of paying for someone else's Master's degree in "Feminist Poetry, 1912 to 1918" who's working as a barista at Starbuck's. 

Without exception, if you played by the rules, played it smart, managed your finances, and lived prudently, you're a sucker.  A chump.  You avoided student loans, or went through school with minimal loans?  Congratulations - you get to pay for those who didn't.  This is guaranteed to create enormous amounts of resentment. 

The second thing is that the root cause for the problem is federal government itself.  There are only so many seats for so many butts in all the colleges in America.  Demand for the seats exceeds supply, leading to the prices wanting to go up, but with student loans the price increases don't reduce demand.  The colleges raise fees to whatever they want knowing that the free market is prohibited there.  No matter how much it costs, the feds will back the loans so that they can fill all those seats.  It has been said before that if you really want to solve these problems, stop giving unlimited student loans. 

This is quite possibly the worst idea for public policy in history, although the competition for that award is pretty intense.  It's so close to the Free College idea it's hard to tell them apart, but it's retroactive free college.  It's completely opposite the real way to reduce student debt, if indeed that's the purpose. 

I Can't Keep Up With These Guys (SpaceX)

Monday's probable test hop of Starship Prototype Serial Number 8 has been moved up to tomorrow (Sunday, Dec. 6) between 12 and 6 PM CST.  There is a "reported but unconfirmed" report that the flight will not be to 15km, but 12.5km, or 8.1 to 6.7 nautical miles.  To me that's a subtle difference that I don't think I'd notice without instruments to tell me.

This morning's Cargo Dragon flight to the ISS has been bumped to tomorrow at 11:17 AM EST.  While not rainy, we're under just about 100% cloud cover, so the delay is fine by me. 

If you go to YouTube to watch, it's easier to come back later than to go backwards in time and come back earlier.  Easiest of all is to watch YouTube for word of the flight having happened and then watch the replay.  Launch watchers always assume that launch can be delayed, like this morning's, but I never expect them to move forward in time. 

White House Again Asks Congress to Allow Europa Mission to Not Fly on SLS

SpaceNews.com reports that once again, as they did last year, the White House has asked congress to remove a Europa Clipper mission requirement that it must fly on the Space Launch System heavy lift booster.  

In a Nov. 30 letter to Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), discussed issues his office had with a series of fiscal year 2021 spending bills Shelby’s committee released Nov. 10. Those bills were intended to serve as the starting point in negotiations with the House, which passed its version of those bills in the summer.

Those Senate bills included a commerce, justice and science spending bill that provides NASA with $23.5 billion in 2021. The bill included language found in previous years’ bills, but not the House version for 2021, that NASA “shall use the Space Launch System as the launch vehicle for the Jupiter Europa Clipper mission.”

The White House points out that a private sector rocket, such as the Falcon Heavy, could get the Europa mission to the Jovian moon it's targeting although the mission would take longer.  The trade off is that the Falcon Heavy would save NASA $700 Million, which could be used on other priorities, and moving the mission off the SLS would save one of those rockets for the Artemis moon missions.  When you combine the savings of launch cost for the Europa probe with having an "extra" SLS booster available, the savings climb to $1.5 Billion.  

The extra lift capacity of the SLS would allow a direct flight to Jupiter, taking around three years.  The Falcon Heavy would add a requirement for one or more gravitational slingshot maneuvers, and add years in deep space before the probe gets there.  This has been rather normal for launches to outer and inner planets in the past. 

However, agency officials said in August they were studying “potential hardware compatibility issues” between the Europa Clipper spacecraft and the SLS. NASA did not elaborate on those problems, but said that “special hardware adjustments” may be needed to address them.

Senator Shelby has been the strongest advocate of the SLS in the Senate because his state is the largest beneficiary of the SLS development funds.  He's from Alabama, home to Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, the center managing SLS development.  In any program as big as SLS, there are jobs distributed around the country, allowing lots of senators and representatives to bring home the bacon to their voters if they get funding.  Typical space program as income redistribution mindset. 

There's also that not-so-small matter of the control of the senate not being resolved, yet, nor the presidency.  If Biden becomes president over a divided government, none of this may be resolved and none of it might matter.  While the Biden campaign has not talked about space policy, campaign statements such as the Democratic Party platform released this summer suggest it may at least slow the pace of returning humans to the moon, eliminating the 2024 goal established by the Trump administration. That could free up an SLS vehicle for a Europa Clipper launch in 2024, the mission’s currently targeted launch date.  A real wild card is that by 2024, Starship may have achieved lunar missions and be a more viable platform to carry Europa Clipper.  SpaceX may have even launched unmanned missions to Mars.  At this point in Starship development, it seems unrealistic to think the program could count on the system being ready. 

JPL rendering of the Europa Clipper with the moon below it and Jupiter behind, upper right. 

You probably know that we're getting close to another of those "government shutdown" kabuki theater episodes.  The government is running under a Continuing Resolution that expires on December 11th.  Whatever this year's spending bills say, the Clipper program office wants to get the choice of booster finalized by the Critical Design Review.  CDR is set for this month as well.  Postponing that decision would increase the mission’s costs as they continue to support analyses for both SLS and the commercial alternative.

Starship Watchers - Looks Like Monday Is Hop Day

Probably.  

I've been watching the Lad Padre feed on and off all week. The first Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) allowing the flight of anything from SpaceX in Boca Chica to 15 km has been approved by the FAA for as early as Monday, and word is they intend to try Monday.  Given the timing of the road closure, if I had to speculate, I'd expect them to try for the early afternoon.  I'll start watching in the morning, prepared to watch until they either announce a scrub or just don't get to it.

SpaceX’s first high-altitude Starship TFR revealed that the crucial flight test is now scheduled sometime between 8 am and 5 pm CST (14:00-23:00 UTC) on Friday, December 4th Monday December 7th, with identical backup windows available (and cleared with the FAA) on Saturday and Sunday [Edit: Unknown]. Originally scheduled as early as November 30th, the delays are less than surprising given the complexity and unprecedented nature of the flight test facing SpaceX.

Starship serial/ship number 8 (SN8) – the first functional full-height prototype – is tasked with launching from Boca Chica, Texas to an apogee of 15 kilometers (~9.5 miles) and dropping back to Earth to test an unproven approach to rocket recovery.
...
Based on several unofficial estimates, Starship SN8 is also likely to break the sound barrier on ascent, potentially putting the prototype through conditions similar to what an actual orbital launch might see at Max Q (the point of maximum aerodynamic pressure). Further adding to the daunting list of ‘firsts’, SN8’s 15 km debut will be the first Starship hop or flight with a nosecone, making it the first full-scale structural test of a nose section and the methods used to attach it to Starship’s tank section. It’s hard to exaggerate the number of things that could go wrong and the number of ways Starship SN8 could fail during its first flight.  [Edits:  see page edit below - SiG]

The Starship is powered by three Raptor engines, capable of 1.3 million pounds of thrust, and SN8 will be very lightly loaded for this mission.  That could produce an exuberant thrust to weight ratio, much more than needed.  The engines can be throttled back and I assume they wouldn't go full thrust for the entire flight.  That doesn't mean they won't go supersonic, as that last quoted paragraph says. 

Remember: Musk pegged the odds of success at about 1 in 3.  That means 2 out of 3 chance that parts will be spread somewhere. 

In the earliest days of the Space Shuttle program, the very first shuttle mission carried only two men: Pilot Bob Crippen and Commander John Young.  I think I recall Bob Crippen saying something like, "when they lit those solid rockets, you knew you're going somewhere."  As in you might be going on your planned flight or your last flight.  No manned flight had relied on solid rocket motors before that moment. 

When they light those Raptors, number eight is going somewhere. 

Screen capture from the C-bass Productions computer animated video, after the transition from belly flop to landing vertically.    

EDIT 2100 EST 3 December 2020:  This post was radically changed moments after posting.  I returned to Lab Padre and the date of the test had changed from Friday, 12/4 to Monday 12/7. 

Walter E. Williams RIP

Like many, I find myself saddened to hear of the untimely passing of economist and conservative giant Walter E. Williams today.  Dr. Williams was 84.  I haven't checked the blog with the search engine, but I'm sure Dr. Williams is among the most quoted people here.  Townhall carries a great tribute column:

Walter Williams, the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George Mason University and longtime columnist, has died at the age of 84.

Williams began writing a weekly column, "A Minority View," in 1981, the penultimate one was titled "Black Education Tragedy Is New," and published Wednesday. According to Creators, his final column will publish next week, which will be available at Townhall, where his columns have appeared for more than 25 years. He is also the author of 10 books, including the most recent, "Race and Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination?" and "Up from the Projects: An Autobiography," and published more than 150 scholarly articles, according to Economic Policy Journal.

Walter Williams worked unto the last.  Thomas Sowell, another great economist I've quoted here, and a long time friend to Walter Williams wrote a touching tribute to his friend, which Townhall has also published today.  Dr. Sowell relays that Walter once told him he hoped that, on the day he died, he would have taught a class that day. And that is just the way it was, when he died today.

RIP Dr. Williams.

Four Weeks After Election Day

We're now four weeks out from election day.  It's early in the evening but within a few hours after I post this, people four weeks ago would have concluded Trump had won, and gone to bed.  That's when the industrial scale cheating started.  I won't go into all the reported incidents of fraud, and so many aspects that are statistically, and even physically impossible, because they've been covered in so many places.  There is so much evidence of fraud here that only those deliberately not looking at it could dismiss it.  I've heard several people say that we send observers to monitor the elections in other countries and they wouldn't approve this one. 

It looks to me like the first big problem is there are tens of thousands of pages of evidence, hundreds of lawyers to deliver them, dozens of expert witnesses, a case that would take a month to do justice in court and a deadline that has to be proven in a week.  The second big problem we have is that the government officials that would be the defendants in those cases have proven that they won't listen to a judge's orders and I'd be less than surprised if people told to preserve evidence were actively destroying it as I type.  A large number of judges and elected officials are perfectly happy with the fraud.  They don't want those pesky American citizens interfering with the election. 

Let's start with one thing that got me thinking this way.  Has everyone heard the report from General McInerney, a former very high ranking officer in the pentagon, saying that the stories about Dominion servers being captured in Germany are true?  That was an operation by US Army special forces against a data center run by the CIA.  Gen. McInerney says he hasn't gotten confirmation but has heard that some of the Army operators were killed.  Start out at the 40 minute mark in the video at NC Renegade.  This is the US Government fighting the US Government – on foreign soil, no less.  Where are those Dominion servers now?  Army intelligence?  When does that information get added to the court cases?

The question I keep coming back to is where do we go from here?  What now?  If it's really the will of the people, and I can see Biden was fairly elected, I can accept that.  It looks to me like the chances of that being the case are about like picking a specific grain of sand out of the Sahara.  Zip.  Zero.  You’re not going to convince me (without lots of numbers checked in dozens of ways) that a clearly scatter-brained geezer who hardly came out of his basement, and got tiny numbers of people at rallies (14?) got more votes than Obama did in '08.

If cheating this obvious (and sloppy) doesn't get fixed this time, the cheating will be worse next time.  There are no more fair and free elections, unless the whole system, nationwide, coast to coast, gets torn down and reasonable voter ID laws are put in place.  The first problem is that these are up to the states to regulate and not the fed.gov.  The second problem is half the country wants it this way, as long as they get their preferred rulers. Add in that the professional apparatchiks in various government agencies (aka "the Deep State") desperately don’t anyone who might reduce the size of the Fed.gov, and we’re saying the Republic is dead. It was a nice experiment while it lasted but it didn’t work, so back to tyranny?

In Pennsylvania, they had a state judge tell the election supervisors to allow free access by Republican observers.  The election supervisors told the court to shove it. Then we had a Supreme Court justice tell them to clean up their act and they told him to shove it. We’ve constructed a society where lawyers decide everything, and if nobody obeys the judges, then what happens? I can see some state police trying to enforce what the judge and justice said, fighting other police who are trying to prevent the enforcement.  Just like the Army vs. the CIA.

David DeGerolamo at NC Renegade puts it like this:

There are many questions that are currently unanswered but there is one fact: if military personnel were killed by the CIA, the civil war between the people and the Deep State has started.

Wanna get your stat geek on?  This image show that Biden won by four of the most extreme vote ratios in the entire country. From this page (H/T to Mark Steyn)

The Next Big Thing - A Private Space Station

Yes, it has been talked about for ages, but now with the reusable orbital class boosters SpaceX has developed, along with the reusable capsules to ride to destinations in orbit, the dream of private sector space station development looks closer than ever to becoming reality.  

Allow me to reintroduce you to Axiom Space, a private company that intends to start launching private missions to the International Space Station in late 2021 or early '22.  We talked about them earlier in the year (March).  They will sell training for private astronauts to make the trip and help them do whatever mission they want to carry out.  In the longer term, they intend to build a private replacement for the ISS starting in early '24.  Which is necessary because the ISS has been inhabited continually for 20 years and is reaching end of life in some areas.  Back in that piece last March, I noted: 

It's worth noting that the ISS is only planned to be in service through 2024 and there are already plans to decommission and deorbit the $100 Billion dollar habitat. NASA officials are hoping to maintain funding through 2028; that would be 30 years after the first modules were placed on orbit. That pretty much guarantees that the annual maintenance costs for the ISS are going up (I have a 40 year old house - DAMHIK).

SpaceX news site Teslarati reports that the first Axiom flight will reuse the Demo-1 capsule flown last May through August.  Tentative launch date is the fourth quarter of '21.  The mission to the ISS will be commanded by former NASA astronaut Mike Lopez-Algeria and will carry three other private astronauts, including Israeli multimillionaire Eytan Stibbe. 

God willin’ and the creek don’t rise, I’ll be leading the Ax-1 crew on the first purely commercial orbital mission in history a little over a year from now – on this very SpaceX Crew Dragon capsule. It’s gonna be a #Blast ! pic.twitter.com/RL0bqbiWQz

— Michael L-A (@CommanderMLA) November 16, 2020

Thanks to the relentless innovation that SpaceX does, we're in a period unlike the previous ten or twenty years and more like the early days of the space program.  The current first regular mission (i.e., not a demo) to the ISS on a SpaceX capsule, Crew-1, is slated to return in six months, or May of 2021.   Until the 63-day Demo-2 mission, only one US manned spacecraft had ever stayed in space that long; the US record for a crewed spacecraft is 84 days.  Crew-1 will easily double that record - it will be in space around 180 days.  Several Russian spacecraft have decades of experience spending at least several months at a time in orbit.  As the first US crewed spacecraft to spend that much time on orbit, you can be sure Crew-1 will be examined closer than any other spacecraft in ages.

But wait, it gets better.

The Demo-2 Crew Dragon capsule is currently scheduled to fly a second time as early as March 31st, 2021 on SpaceX’s Crew-2 mission, ferrying another four astronauts to the ISS. If successful, Crew-2 will represent the first commercial astronaut launch ever to reuse both an orbital-class rocket booster and an orbital spacecraft, and the NASA-overseen process of refurbishment and re-flight will thus pave the way for future flight-proven astronaut launches. That includes private company Axiom Space’s first private AX-1 astronaut launch, which is currently scheduled to launch as early as Q4 2021. [Bold added - SiG]

In that bolded sentence, strike the word "commercial."  It will be the first launch by anyone to reuse both an orbital-class booster and an orbital spacecraft.

Axiom's vision of their own space station.  Older articles talk about them launching a lab that can be docked to the ISS and provide facilities for the private astronauts they want to put up there.  The current website implies that "Axiom Hub One" (crew quarters, + research and manufacturing capability) appears to be what they want to launch first to get their own station started. 

A Ham Radio Series 19 – What is Phase Noise?

If I get a chance to talk with other hams about receivers, the questions often come down to why some receivers are so much more expensive than others.  Someone might say something like, “an RTL-SDR costs $30, while a professional grade receiver like an IC-R8600 covers a bit more frequency but costs $2300.  It’s way bigger, too.  What’s the difference?”  That’s a question with many answers, often deep in details.  It’s hard to read much about the details in product reviews without coming across references to transmitter and receiver noise performance and the mention of phase noise.  What is phase noise and why does less of it cost so much more?
 
This is one of those topics that can fill a book, so let me try to break this down to some simple ideas.  Consider an oscillator that you build to produce one single frequency; perhaps a crystal oscillator, perhaps LC; the technology doesn’t matter.  Ideally, the oscillator would produce just that one frequency you’ve designed it to produce.  It would output a voltage, V(t) = A * sin(2*pi*f*t) where A is the amplitude, f is the frequency, t the time the voltage occurs. 

As I harp on all the time, nature is a bitch and the reality we get is not that ideal value.  What we get is something like V(t) = [A+E(t)] * sin(2*pi*f*t+p(t)).  That’s a fancy way of saying that in addition to the desired output we get fluctuations in amplitude E(t) in time, and fluctuations in phase p(t).  As a general rule, the effects of the phase fluctuations dominate the amplitude noise.  Perhaps you’ve seen a signal on an oscilloscope where you can see the signal width (time) varying slightly, perhaps an edge of the square wave is jumping around slightly on the screen.  That’s called jitter and jitter is just another way of describing phase noise (you can convert jitter in time to phase noise and vice versa).  If this signal is listened to on a good receiver, or observed on a spectrum analyzer, it goes from being the ideal situation in which all the power appears on one frequency to a signal with a noise around it that drops off as the frequency offset increases.  This is called a noise pedestal.  The higher the phase noise from the oscillator, the higher that pedestal is.

This is frequency in the WiFi band, and shows noise in a 10 MHz span.  I’ll get back to some descriptions of what you’re seeing after some additional points.

One of the most important things to know about noise is that the way we see it depends on how we look at it.  (Hmm… almost sounds like a zen saying)  By that I mean that if it’s truly random noise, the power goes up as the measurement bandwidth goes up.  Because of that relationship and the ease of converting the effects in different bandwidths, noise is usually specified as a power in decibels below the desired signal in a 1 Hz bandwidth, or dBc/Hz.  To convert the levels seen, simply use 10*log(bandwidth ratio).  If we double the bandwidth, the noise power is 3 dB higher; if we use 100 times the bandwidth, the noise power is 20 dB higher and so on.  This allows easy, direct calculation of the effects of the noise on our system.

In that scope picture, it says along the bottom left that the “resolution bandwidth” (RBW) is 100 kHz; 10*log(100,000) is 50, so the noise in 1 Hz is 50 dB lower or -50dBc.  Look at the point 2 MHz above the signal that I circled.  That noise is about 50 dB below the desired signal, so -50dBc -50 dB says it’s -100dBc/Hz.  By the way, if you’re intending to measure noise, it’s good practice to make the video bandwidth (VBW) 1/10 of the RBW all the way down to 1/100 of the RBW.  This makes for long sweep times, but video averages out much of the variation in the noise level. 

What difference does this make?  First off, let’s look at the transmitter side.  Say you’re operating ham radio field day and you’re at a club station that wants one station on CW and another on phone on some band at all times.  Consider 20 meters, and say the CW guy is at 14.025 MHz while the phone guys are 14.225.  A good transmitter could have the phase noise down 145 dB 200 kHz away, right on the CW guy’s frequency.  You’re putting out 100W, which is +50 dBm.  Noise 145 below that is -95 dBm.  In the 500 Hz bandwidth the CW guy is using that adds back up to -68 dBm.  Sure that’s a tiny fraction of a billionth of a watt (1nW = -60 dBm), but it’s a very big signal to a receiver.  It’s 89 microvolts in 50 ohms when the radio can copy under 1 microvolt easily – less than ¼ of a microvolt.  

In reality, that -68 dBm only exists at the transmitter output and what the receiver hears depends on how much loss there is between the transmit and receive antenna.  The only thing that can help here is having their antennas as far apart as possible to add path loss that would lower the noise. 

Phase noise is also a problem for receivers, but in other ways than just hearing another transmitter.  The main issue is that phase noise on the receiver local oscillator can mix with undesired signals out of band and translate noise or spurious onto the desired channel as interfering signals.  For reasons I’ve never quite grasped, this is referred to as “reciprocal mixing” – it seems like straight up, normal mixing to me.  In effect, your receiver’s local oscillator becomes self-jamming.

This drawing depicts the LO with noise dropping off in the adjacent channel, mixing noise into desired IF.  In ham radio, where most services are not channelized, the offset can be tiny.  They’re attempting to show that the noise mixed onto the undesired signal is degrading the signal to noise ratio of the desired signal.  If there are spurious signals on the LO, they'll mix into the channel, too.  If the desired signal is weaker than pictured, you can imagine it completely under the noise pedestal mixed on top of it. 

Exactly how to design a low phase noise local oscillator is so far beyond the scope of what I can do here that I can barely address it.  In a PLL, the phase noise of the voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) affects the noise more farther from the carrier, and a VCO with bigger components, higher Q, will be lower noise (rule of engineering: Q comes by the cubic yard).  The amount of division in the frequency synthesizer affects the noise closer to the carrier than the VCO.  Direct digital synthesizers are typically lower phase noise than a synthesizer, but much richer in spurious output signals.  Those spurs also mix in to the IF by reciprocal mixing. 

The newer, higher-end ham radios on the market have eliminated the receiver LO by doing RF direct sampling; they bandpass filter the signals being received and then convert them to digital without mixing in the analog world.  Likewise, the transmit LO can be produced by a Direct Digital Synthesizer and the modulation performed in digital signal processing, before converting the modulated signals to RF to amplify and transmit.

I Prefer a Different Name

SpaceX booster 1049, designated as B1049-7 to denote having flown seven times,returned to Port Canaveral today to come ashore for its journey to the booster refurbishment facility and then back to another flight.  NASA Spaceflight has a camera set up at the port now to catch the return of all boosters and fairings that come back.  They're calling it SpaceX's sootiest booster yet, and that's the name I propose changing.  That video is an hour and a half video, by the way.  It's unedited, just the camera stream as it happened, but you can skip around in it and look at anything you'd like.  You should look around the video for a recovered faring on a truck - around 1:11:00.  I was startled by the size perspective.  

This screen capture was right before the moment where Lando Calrissian and Han Solo stumble out of the base of the booster, obviously hung over and each blaming the other for getting caught.  NASA Spaceflight calls it SpaceX's sootiest booster, but that's not really soot.  The black is scorch marks from its trips.  The straight lines are cleaned areas to allow inspection of weld lines - part of the inspection between flights.  It's just a used spaceship.

Since it's not really soot, I think I'd call it the Millennium Falcon, probably the best-known used spaceship.  A nation of Star Wars freaks would be in awe.

The rumor out of Lab Padre is the launch to 15 km is still scheduled for Monday, but the Temporary Flight Restriction notice (TFR) has not gone through, and the weather isn't looking good for Monday either.  I checked the National Weather Service Weather Prediction Center since we're getting our strongest cold front of the season Monday and I thought perhaps they're getting it too.  That would be unusual, and it doesn't seem to be the case.  Tuesday and Wednesday have road closures scheduled as back up to Monday.  I'll be checking in on the channel to see if the overview changes or the schedule gets confirmed. 

EDIT 11/29 @ 10:00 PM EST:  Lab Padre is saying the 15km flight is No Earlier Than 12/2.  Monday, 11/30 will be a static firing test. 

I Think It's Becoming My Annual Black Friday Post

Looking back on the phrase "Black Friday," it seems I've done a post about this unofficial national holiday every year.  I think sometimes more than once.  You might say, I'm a little curmudgeonly about the whole thing.  

 
Back when I was a production test technician (between iterations of college) I worked for an electronics manufacturer that shipped on a quarterly system, meaning that orders were booked and the company's financial results were tracked by the quarter.  Since I was in the group doing the final system tests, by the time products got to us, every delay that could have possibly happened had pretty much all happened and things were running late.  To stretch a metaphor, they were pushing the product to get shipped so hard that if you got between the product and the shipping door you'd be crushed to death.  Our shipping department had metal garage doors tall enough to let a semi-trailer back up to the dock so we could roll things in on fork lifts or dollies.  So much product was pushed so hard through those metal doors that the morning after the last day of the quarter there were literally metallic hemorrhoids glistening in the morning sun around the frame of the garage doors.  OK, so maybe I was the only person who could see them.

In the weeks before that, the production expediters would go through the work orders coming into my department and mark which of them were “hot” and should be worked on first.  In the last week or two, pretty much everything was marked that way.  You've probably been wondering where I'm going with this: it's that I told a production coordinator at one time, “when everything's hot, nothing's hot.”  To his befuddled and exasperated expression I calmly explained that nobody can work on everything first, I can only work on one thing first.  Only one thing can be most important.

And now that we're over the target, by extension, when every day is Black Friday, no day can be Black Friday - in the usual sense of a special day that kicks off the Christmas shopping season. 

I don't know about you, but I'm sure I started seeing black Friday ads in July.  For sure, for the last month, I must have been getting 50 to 75 emails a day with black Friday in the subject.

When did this become a national thing?  It seems it must have been within the last five or ten years. 

Black Friday was supposedly called that because it was the day where businesses turned their annual ledgers from red ink to black ink, but in the last few years it seems to have morphed into something else.  It has been reported for years that the big deals aren't necessarily really deals at all, or that some companies raise their prices in the weeks (months?) before the day so that what would have been a normal, small discount from MSRP suddenly seems like a deal.  It's being reported that more and more people are carrying their smartphone into the stores to price check things, compare price and availability at other stores, or get coupons.  I confess: I've done it and not just this time of year. 

Once there started to be a perception that good deals came on Black Friday, it was only a matter of time until it became just another way of saying “BIG SALE!”  But shoppers like to think they're getting big deals, and there are stores that put one or two items on a massive discount to get some people to line up the night before.  Maybe they can get some buzz on the news.  Of course, now that stores are opening on Thanksgiving itself, Friday seems like it loses some drawing power.  Regardless, every year there's some incident where people get violent over something stupid.

It always pays to know what going prices are.  I've heard that generally speaking, the best time for deals is closer to Christmas, especially right before Christmas.  You'll get better prices than this week, but it's a gamble.  You're betting that the stores will be stuck with something you want and would rather discount it than not sell it.  If they sell out first you lose.  If they don't sell out but still won't or can't cut the price, again you lose.  That said, it has worked out for me in the past.  It's sort of like calling a bluff in poker. 

Retail is a rough way to make a living. I'm sure you've heard how airline reservation systems base the seat price on the apparent interest in a flight.  If you go back and check on the price of that seat every week, the system says there must be more demand for that flight and raises the price.  What if stores could measure real time demand and adjust the price.  Say you're looking for a new tool or other gadget; what if they see someone checking the web site regularly and interpret that as several people interested in that item and raised its price?  Would you be upset or offended?  What if they dropped the price to see at what level you can't resist pushing the Glistening, Candy-like, "BUY IT" button?  I don't have any hard evidence that anyone does that, but it seems trivial for an online store to track interest in something.  The biggest risk is scaring away customers.

To me the Golden Rule is the willing seller/willing buyer.  My inner engineer drives me to optimize things, but if people are happy with what they paid, regardless of whether or not it really is "the best price of the year", and the seller is happy with the price they got for it, that's definition of a fair price.  I'm sure not gonna poop in anyone's corn flakes by telling them they didn't get the best price.

Yesterday we took our traditional trip to my brother's house in South Florida, a bit short of 300 miles round trip.  It was a big get-together, with 16 people together.  Since we're not under lockdowns here in Florida, traffic seemed normal. Maybe a little light, but nothing really obvious. I have no idea what the stores will be like, but probably worse if you're in a blue state or city under lockdown. There will be no crowds and no people fighting over the one or two items that had the big discount.  An article on Breitbart shows this Black Friday scene, this morning. 

Jeenah Moon/Getty Images, Macey's Department Store in New York City, this morning.

Tuesday Was a Make Up Day

On Sunday I posted that SpaceX had scheduled a static fire test of Starship Prototype SN8 for Monday the 23rd, but Sunday night itself there would be a Falcon 9 launch "up the road" at 9:56 PM.  The launch was scrubbed Sunday night and Monday they never achieved the static firing.  

As you might gather from the post title, Tuesday was the day to make up for the missed milestones and there was both a successful and uneventful static firing of number 8 and a successful launch of 60 more Starlink satellites, marking the seventh successful flight (and recovery) of B1049.  If you want to watch it in lots of detail, a video of the SN8 static firing from NASA Spaceflight (.com) is available.  Elon Musk says the static firing was nominal and the vehicle is cleared for the 15km test flight on Monday. 

The mission video from the Starlink launch is here, queued up to start at T-1 minute before launch.  I've grabbed a screen capture from the video a few seconds after the booster landed; long enough for the camera to recover from its shock of going from photographing the ocean at night with a few lights on to a rocket's plume 90 million f-stops brighter, and then a few seconds for the smoke to clear so you can see the booster standing there.

The only bad aspect to me was that at launch time for the Starlink mission, it had clouded over badly and we saw absolutely nothing.  Maybe the clouds in the direction of the mission got a little brighter. 

Getting back to Texas and the Starships, a quote from the Teslarati article linked earlier is worthwhile.

Having now spent more than a month at the launch pad, it’s increasingly unlikely that SpaceX will continue to choose caution first for upcoming Starship SN8 tests. As Musk recently noted and easily visible from public roads, SpaceX’s Boca Chica factory is developing an extraordinary backlog of giant steel rockets. Just today, November 25th, Starship SN9 (featuring “small improvements”) was officially reached its full 50-meter (~165 ft) height after SpaceX kicked off nose section installation. In simpler terms, if SN8 is destroyed during testing, Starship SN9 will likely be ready to roll to the launch site almost as soon as the pad is clear.

Meanwhile, Starship SN10 is likely just 7-10 days away from a similar nosecone stacking milestone and Starship SN11’s tank section is just one stack away from completion, likely putting it less than two weeks behind SN10. In other words, insofar as speed is a priority and each prototype is anywhere close to as cheap as Starship’s majority-steel bill of materials, SpaceX is building the rockets so quickly that it almost doesn’t make sense to spend more than a few weeks working through any given ship’s bugs.  Bold added: SiG
....
It doesn’t come as a huge surprise, then, that Musk has given SN8 – warts and all – a 33% chance of successfully launching, ‘skydiving’ back to Earth, reigniting one or more Raptors, and landing in one piece. The only real certainty is that regardless of the outcome, Starship’s high-altitude launch debut is guaranteed to be spectacular.

My mind is officially blown. 

Most of you will read this on Thanksgiving, which is tomorrow at the time I'm posting this.  Let me take a moment to wish you and yours a happy and blessed Thanksgiving!  I'll be taking the day off and be back on Friday. 

My Little Engine is Pointless

I should make that, "despite my best efforts, my engine is pointless...um... pointsless?"  The engine is designed for an old-fashioned points, ignition coil and capacitor (condenser, if you must) ignition.  I decided to upgrade it to a capacitive discharge ignition (CDI) for model engines, from a guy who sells to the hobby engine makers.  At that point I had a choice between using a hall effect sensor or the points and decided to stay with points. 

The plans say to use points from, "1969 DODGE CHARGER, 383, 4BL, W/SINGLE POINT DIST" but the only place where that matters is in the mounting dimensions. I could have adjusted the piece of metal that the points mount to, if I had understood that back when I was getting started (this is one of the first pieces I made for the engine).  Let's say I had a set of points from some really old car I used to have; I could have redesigned the mounting support and used those.  I eventually searched for points on AutoZone and Advance Auto Parts; the two national chains are within a block or two of each other and a couple of miles from home. I had to pay for the points at AutoZone on Saturday and have them delivered to my local store from their regional warehouse in Orlando.  I got them this afternoon and had them installed quickly, once I found the two screws I needed.

Something's missing.  These are actually the wrong points in AutoZone's cross reference.  You can see a sheet metal spring hanging off to the lower right around the black SHCS, and to the lower left of that screw is the moving contact on its plastic mount.  The plans for the engine show a bent up piece of metal on the bottom of the arm between the two mounting screws (flat blade/slot screws shown), and a stud with hardware on it (circled in red) between the screws connecting the points to the capacitor. 

A little more research took me to their competitor, Advance Auto Parts, and they have the points I need.  Tomorrow I'll call or drop by to see if they stock them or I have to order from Orlando again. 

Until I get the points, I have more stuff to do.  I need to cut a little gasket material to go between the cylinder and cylinder head.  In the last couple of days, I put together a little fuel tank holder to keep the tank in the right relationship to the carburetor input.  Hopefully.

That's two U shaped aluminum uprights on a 3/8" thick aluminum plate.  The plate needs some finishing work done on it to make it look nicer.  Actually, everything could use some "prettying up," it's just too late for most of the engine.  I've seen people run these electronic ignitions spread across their workbench, and I need to take a look at making a little box for that.  I will assume attention should be paid to whether it's metal and all ground or maybe made of wood.

I have no idea how long it will take to get this running.  It took me several tries to get my flame eater to run OK, and I'm sure there's a lot here I'll need to do.  OTOH, I've bought or made everything I think I need - and I don't think another problem like the wrong points is possible.  I sure would like to have this running soon, though. 

NASA Has an Anti-Exploration Group Fighting to Keep the US Earthbound

I'd heard rumors of this, but didn't pay it much attention.  This morning's email brought a link from Bill Whittle and an absolute Must See video.  

NASA’s Equity Diversity and Inclusion Working Group (EDIWG) publishes an anti-capitalist, anti-colonialist manifesto which, if followed, would effectively ban the USA from exploration of Mars, our Moon and other planetary bodies. After all, our “extractive capitalism” approach could interfere with evolution of microbes on lifeless worlds. How shall we meet the EDIWG invasion of NASA?

The video makes some points I've never heard of, including that the Viking missions in 1976 was the last Mars mission with experiments on it to search for life because of the actions of this group under the name of the Planetary Protection Office.  A strange name because it implies protection of this planet and they apparently have nothing to do with that.  Exobiologists are not allowed to search for life on another planet until they can prove there is no life there.  Excuse me?   How is that even remotely logical?

No missions to planets that might have microbes on them - think Mars because it might harm microbial life on the planet.  What about a sterile body like Earth's moon?  Can't go there either because it might harm microbes that could eventually evolve!  (I'm not making this up)  Can't mine asteroids, also sterile bodies, because that's extractive capitalism.  Can't do anything.

It should go without saying that this is aimed at destroying American efforts in space because you can bet your butt the Chinese aren't going listen to NASA's EDIWG.  Watch if you have a high stupidity tolerance, read the PDF.  Paging Elon Musk: you may need to relocate to outside the US, if you can find any place that will grant you the freedom to launch to Mars.

Back to Normal at SpaceX Boca Chica

It was back on Friday the 13th that I posted an update on SpaceX's testing program at Boca Chica, after a meltdown during the static engine firing test on the preceding Tuesday.  After ten days without any road closures or other tests scheduled, yesterday they announced road closure for tomorrow, 11/23, from 7a-6p CST, 1300-0000 UTC, with Tuesday and Wednesday as backups.  Expect more cryogenic proof testing and another static fire test, possibly more than one.    

The bigger news from them is the long anticipated test flight to 15 km (~50,000 feet) has been scheduled for Monday November 30th, with the same 7a-6p CST hours.  It has never had a committed launch date before.   Tuesday and Wednesday 12/1 and 12/2 are backup dates, same hours.  Elon Musk has committed to live streaming this launch saying it might be really ugly but we'll see it in real time the same time he does. 

Let's see... the SN8 meltdown was Tuesday the 10th; the Do Over is Monday the 23rd.  Considering the talk about redesign of the Starship and changes to the launch facilities, a delay of less than two weeks seems astounding. 

View of the "flying sparklies" from the night of Tuesday the 10th, from the NASA Spaceflight (.com) video posted Wednesday the 11th. 

Meanwhile, here within viewing distance of the Kennedy Space Center/Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, we're counting down to the 9:56 PM launch of another Starlink mission (Starlink-15).  Yesterday's Falcon 9 launch from Vandenburg Air Force Base set a record for launches by SpaceX in one year at 22.  This makes tonight's launch doubly special; in addition to setting a new record for number of launches in a year (and any more launches will do the same) it will be the seventh launch of booster B1049.  That will be the most launches of any reusable rocket and one more step toward their long-time goal of 10 launches 'without a major refurbishment.' 

With tonight's launch #23, SpaceX is looking towards a year of 25 launches (possibly more - Spaceflight Now has four launches before the end of the year)), but a couple of times, CEO Elon Musk has revealed that the company is pushing to achieve as many as 48 launches in 2021. 

Test Post and Infobleg

 First, the test post.  Ever seen square gears?  

I think it's one thing to visualize that motion and another to design the shapes.

This is animated gif that I made from an .mp4 video I found at Homemade Tools.  This is the first time I've done an .mp4 to .gif conversion, using the free versions of a video editor I've trying out. 

Which gets me to the info bleg.  I'm looking for a video editor for my YouTube channel.  This video editor (VSDC) isn't expensive to upgrade, but it has far more features than I care about.  For my purposes, the screens are way cluttered with things I just don't want.  I don't have much in mind that I want to do, but consider a running engine or a machining operation.  I can see running those videos at twice normal speed, doing a voice over of and perhaps adding a text screen.

Think of things more like documentaries and less like what kids do with their phones. 

So of those of you who do videos for yourself or friends or have YouTube channels, what's a good, video editor without too much bloating in it?     

Rocket Lab Recovers First Mission Flown Booster

We've been covering the advancements of Rocket Lab (or one word: RocketLab) since they started picking up international headlines three years ago and have watched their success in the small payload market.  If they haven't cornered the market, they're close.  In August of '19 they announced that they were going to move toward recovering boosters and last December they conducted a test flight to take data and ensure they understood the issues.    

This week they did it “for real” with a mission for paying customers and recovered the Electron booster.  Unlike the better-known SpaceX Falcon 9, the electron booster is too small, and too close to its limits on any given flight to retain fuel for a powered landing back either on land or on an autonomous drone ship.  Instead, they planned to come down under a gliding wing parachute, and get caught out of the air by a heavy lift helicopter.  Which doesn't seem to be quite how the booster in this released photo got there.  Parachute?  Yes.  Helicopter?  Must have missed the catch. 

Rocket Lab ordinarily names every mission, sometimes with a cheeky reference to the mission itself.  This flight was called "Return to Sender" and the booster is doing just that.  I'm being mildly facetious myself.  Ars Technica reports Rocket Lab saying they didn't attempt the helicopter snag of the parachute this time. 

Return to Sender didn't test the full process, but it was the first in which RocketLab would attempt to deploy the parachute to facilitate a gentle splashdown and recovery. This would allow the company to get detailed readings of the stresses and temperatures that the Electron experienced during reentry.

While the livestream of the mission cut out before the splashdown took place, the company released a statement indicating that the rocket had been successfully recovered and posted posted photographic evidence to its Twitter feed.

This little addition to the post seems too good not to add:

But one final bit of payload won't be remaining in orbit. RocketLab is terming it a "mass simulator," but it's a 3D-printed titanium garden gnome named Gnome Chompski, modeled on an item from the Half-Life game series. In the game, the goal was to sneak the gnome onto a rocket and send it to space. Supposedly, it was being sent to test the performance of 3D printed hardware during the rigors of launch. But in reality it was an excuse for Valve’s Gabe Newell to donate money to charity—one dollar to anyone who watched the livestream within the first day. So far, Gnome Chompski's launch has raised over $80,000 for the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit at Starship Children’s Hospital in Auckland.

Gnome Chompski in space.  Echoes of Starman.